Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 18 — STATE DEBT, REVENUE OBLIGATIONS AND OPERATING NOTES
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 18.02 (2026)

Scope of subchapter

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
18.0218.02 Scope of subchapter. Public debt may be contracted and evidences of indebtedness issued therefor only to the amounts, for the purposes, by the procedures and with the kinds of evidence of indebtedness specified in this subchapter, except that this subchapter is not applicable:
18.02(1)(1) To public debt, not exceeding in the aggregate $100,000, incurred for the purpose of defraying extraordinary expenditures of the state.
18.02(2)(2) To public debt incurred to repel invasion, suppress insurrection or defend the state in time of war.
18.02 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 29 s. 1652.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013). · cites it 2× “Kersey, New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition § 18.02[6][a] (Jeffrey E. Thomas & Francis J.”
David Stroede v. Soc'y Ins., A Mut. Co., 2021 WI 43 (Wis. 2021). “, Ordinance § 18.02 (for purposes of the city's fire code, defining "occupant" as "[t]he person or persons, who physically reside, work or are present in a facility").”
Acuity v. Ross Glove Co., 2012 WI App 70 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “3 New Appleman Law of Liability Insurance § 18.02(3)(b)(ii) (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.”
Town of Delton v. Liston, 2007 WI App 120 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “) § 18.02(8)(a) (1992) conflicts with Wis. Stat.”
Air Eng'g, Inc. v. Indus. Air Power, LLC, 2013 WI App 18 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). “"The majority of jurisdictions hold that even if the underlying complaint alleges that the policyholder knew that it was committing a wrongful act, the insurance company still has a duty to defend if the policyholder could still be liable without a showing of intentional conduct.”
Schinner v. Gundrum, 2012 WI App 31 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See 3 New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition § 18.02[6][a] (Jeffrey E. Thomas & Francis J.”
— Wis. Stat. § 18.02(3)(b)(ii) — 1 case
Acuity v. Ross Glove Co., 2012 WI App 70 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012). “3 New Appleman Law of Liability Insurance § 18.02(3)(b)(ii) (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.”
— Wis. Stat. § 18.02(8)(a) — 1 case
Town of Delton v. Liston, 2007 WI App 120 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “) § 18.02(8)(a) (1992) conflicts with Wis. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.