Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 227.58 (2026)
Appeals
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
227.58227.58 Appeals. Any party, including the agency, may secure a review of the final judgment of the circuit court by appeal to the court of appeals within the time period specified in s. 808.04 (1).
227.58 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1983: This section is amended by repealing the appeal deadline of 30 days from notice of entry of judgment for greater uniformity. An appeal must be initiated within the time specified in s. 808.04 (1), stats. This section is further amended to eliminate the superfluous provision that the appeal is taken in the manner of other civil appeals. Civil appeal procedures are governed by chs. 808 and 809. [Bill 151-S]
227.58 AnnotationThe court of appeals had no power to remand a case under s. 806.07 (1) (b) or (h); this chapter cannot be supplemented by statutory remedies pertaining to civil procedure. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. LIRC, 91 Wis. 2d 462, 283 N.W.2d 603 (Ct. App. 1979).
227.58 AnnotationJudicial review of a decision by an administrative agency requires a court reviewing a decision on appeal to review the decision of the agency, not the circuit court. However, the reviewing court affirms or reverses the order of the circuit court under s. 227.57. The scope of review of the reviewing court is the same as that of the circuit court. Town of Holland v. PSC, 2018 WI App 38, 382 Wis. 2d 799, 913 N.W.2d 914, 17-1129.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Jocz v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 538 N.W.2d 588 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
Jocz v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 538 N.W.2d 588 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “The Commission affirmed and adopted the administrative law judge's decision and conclusions.”
Miller Brewing Co. v. Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 563 N.W.2d 460 (Wis. 1997). “Kozera and DILHR appealed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 227.58 . On July 9, 1996, the court of appeals reversed the circuit court's decision.”
Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue v. Hogan, 543 N.W.2d 825 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “The Commission's Authority to Certify the Class Because the circuit court dismissed the department's petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (competency to proceed), based on its conclusion that the petition for review had not been timely filed, the court did not…”
Moran v. Wis. Dep't of Just., 932 N.W.2d 430 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “Finally, the court rejected Moran's constitutional arguments-namely, his assertions that the denial violated his constitutional rights to bear arms and that the United States Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause required Wisconsin to recognize his restoration of rights…”
City of Oak Creek v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 518 N.W.2d 276 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “The examiner did not err in refusing to consider evidence of the cost of concrete removal.”
Metro. Greyhound Mgmt. Corp. v. Wisconsin Racing Bd., 460 N.W.2d 802 (Wis. Ct. App. 1990). “The appeal is before this court pursuant to sec. 227.58, Stats. Second, Metropolitan Greyhound Management and Metropolitan Racing were (unlike Charter) parties to the administrative determination about which they complain.”
Alleghany Corp. v. Haase, 708 F. Supp. 1507 (W.D. Wis. 1989). “§ 227.58. The Commissioner’s decision specifically noted Alleghany’s right to such a rehearing or judicial review.”
Hutson v. State Pers. Com'n, 2002 WI App 249 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “In May and June 1999, the Commission conducted a five-day hearing on Hutson's complaint and, more than one year later, on August 28, 2000, the Commission issued its Decision and Order dismissing Hutson's action against DOC. Hutson then sought circuit court review of the…”
Miller Brewing Co. v. Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 553 N.W.2d 837 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “The only issue before us is whether 301 of the LMRA preempted Kozera's state law claim under the FMLA.”
Demonta Antonio Hall v. Wisconsin Dep't of Just., 2020 WI App 12 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “) Administratively, the refusal to expunge was upheld and Hall filed this WIS.”
Sierra Club v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Wisconsin (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 196.03(1). Ultimately, the PSC concluded that there was “sufficient evidence in the record to approve the fixed charges proposed” in the settlement agreement.”
Town of Christiana v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Wisconsin (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 227.58; accordingly, “we review the decision of the agency, not the circuit court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.