Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 23 — CONSERVATION
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 23.13 (2026)

Governor to be informed

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
23.1323.13 Governor to be informed. The board of commissioners of public lands and the department of natural resources shall furnish to the governor upon the governor’s request a copy of any paper, document or record in their respective offices and give the governor orally such information as the governor may call for.
23.13 HistoryHistory: 1971 c. 164; 1991 a. 316.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2017 · leading case: Maya Elaine Smith v. Jeff Anderson, 2017 WI 43 (Wis. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maya Elaine Smith v. Jeff Anderson, 2017 WI 43 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 8× “Heffernan gives the following practice tip in Appellate Practice and Procedure in Wisconsin § 23.13 (7th ed. 2016), regarding a response to a petition for review: (continued) 3 No.”
State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2003 WI App 82 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “However, in June 2001, Washington county amended the relevant ordinance, § 23.13(3)(d) of the Shoreland, Wetland and Floodplain Zoning section of the Washington County Code, to prohibit any expansion of any portion of an existing structure within 50 feet of the ordinary high…”
State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 23 (Wis. 2004). “, Code § 23.13(3)(d). Accordingly, the petitioners need a variance to go ahead with their plans.”
— Wis. Stat. § 23.13(3)(d) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2003 WI App 82 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “However, in June 2001, Washington county amended the relevant ordinance, § 23.13(3)(d) of the Shoreland, Wetland and Floodplain Zoning section of the Washington County Code, to prohibit any expansion of any portion of an existing structure within 50 feet of the ordinary high…”
State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 23 (Wis. 2004). “, Code § 23.13(3)(d). Accordingly, the petitioners need a variance to go ahead with their plans.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.