Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 24.16 (2026)
Applications for private sale
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
24.1624.16 Applications for private sale. Every person making application under s. 24.15 for the purchase at private sale of any public lands shall file in the office of the board an application in writing, describing the lot or tract that the person proposes to purchase by the proper number of the section, township and range, and the subdivision of the section, with the person’s name subscribed to the application. The board shall, if the land applied for may then be sold, do all of the following:
24.16(1)(1) Enter on books kept for that purpose a note of the application, specifying the day when made, the name of the applicant, and the description of the land applied for.
24.16(2)(2) Give to the applicant a memorandum signed by the executive secretary of the board, stating the application, describing the lot or tract applied for, and stating the price at which the lot or tract may be sold and the amount to be paid at the time of the sale.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2008 · leading case: State v. Popenhagen, 2008 WI 55 (Wis. 2008).
State v. Popenhagen, 2008 WI 55 (Wis. 2008). “, Wisconsin Practice § 24.16 (1996). ¶ 185 The majority opinion observes the two statutory examples of motions that may be brought under Wis.”
Custodian of Records for the Legislative Tech. Servs. Bureau v. State, 2004 WI 65 (Wis. 2004). “1993); see also 9 Wiseman, Chiarkas and Blinka, Wisconsin Practice: Criminal Practice and Procedure § 24.16 (1996) ("The probable cause necessary to obtain a subpoena for records is essentially the same as that necessary to obtain a search warrant.”
Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Norton, 327 F. Supp. 2d 995 (W.D. Wis. 2004). “They cite James Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 24.16(6), at 24-671 (2d ed.1981) (deleted from the third edition),for the proposition that a party granted leave to intervene “makes himself vulnerable to complete adjudication by the federal court of the issues in litigation…”
— Wis. Stat. § 24.16(6) — 1 case
Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Norton, 327 F. Supp. 2d 995 (W.D. Wis. 2004). “They cite James Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 24.16(6), at 24-671 (2d ed.1981) (deleted from the third edition),for the proposition that a party granted leave to intervene “makes himself vulnerable to complete adjudication by the federal court of the issues in litigation…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.