Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 27.06 (2026)

Mill-tax appropriation

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

27.0627.06 Mill-tax appropriation. The county board may annually, at the same time that other county taxes are levied, levy a tax upon the taxable property of such county for the purchase of land and the payment of expenses incurred in carrying on the work of the park commission. In every county having a population of 750,000 or more, the county park commission shall be subject to s. 59.60.

27.06 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 78, 200, 422; 1995 a. 201; 2017 a. 207 s. 5.

27.06 AnnotationThe mill annual tax levy limitations set forth in this section apply when county parks are operated by a county park commission, pursuant to s. 27.02, et seq., or a county board committee to which the functions and duties of a park commission have been transferred but not when county parks are operated under the express provisions of s. 27.015 [now s. 27.019]. Annual taxes levied to pay principal and interest on county indebtedness incurred under ch. 67 for park purposes must be included within the mill limitation set forth in this section. Proceeds from the sale of part of a county park may be used for capital improvements in county parks in addition to a maximum annual levy under this section. 60 Atty. Gen. 124.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1976–1987 · leading case: Madison Madison Int'l of Illinois, P.C. v. Matra, S.A. (In Re Madison Madison Int'l of Illinois, P.C.), 77 B.R. 678 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Madison Madison Int'l of Illinois, P.C. v. Matra, S.A. (In Re Madison Madison Int'l of Illinois, P.C.), 77 B.R. 678 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1987). “§ 27.06 (1986 Annual Cumulative Supplement).”

Omernick v. LaRocque, 406 F. Supp. 1156 (W.D. Wis. 1976). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.06 (1958), cited in Barry Labs., Inc.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.