Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 30.10 (2026)
Declarations of navigability
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
30.10(1)(1) Lakes. All lakes wholly or partly within this state which are navigable in fact are declared to be navigable and public waters, and all persons have the same rights therein and thereto as they have in and to any other navigable or public waters.
30.10(2)(a)(a) Subject to par. (b) and except as provided under sub. (4) (c) and (d), all streams, sloughs, bayous, and marsh outlets, which are navigable in fact for any purpose whatsoever, are declared navigable to the extent that no dam, bridge, or other obstruction shall be made in or over the same without the permission of the state.
30.10(2)(b)(b) If the department makes a determination that a stream or portion of a stream is not navigable and a dam is constructed on the stream that modifies the flow of the stream or portion of the stream as compared to the natural flow of the stream or portion of the stream prior to its construction, and if an artificial impoundment created by the dam is or has been subject to a federal fish and wildlife service Partners for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Development Agreement or, as determined by the department, a similar publicly administered environmental restoration project, then the department may not change its determination of non-navigability with respect to the stream or portion of the stream unless all of the following conditions are met:
30.10(2)(b)1.1. All structures that affect the flow of the stream or portion of the stream are removed.
30.10(2)(b)2.2. All changes to the stream or land adjacent to the stream that could affect the flow of the stream or portion of the stream are substantially returned to their natural state.
30.10(2)(b)3.3. A department evaluation of the navigability of the stream or portion of the stream conducted after the conditions in subds. 1. and 2. are met indicates that the department’s determination of non-navigability should be changed.
30.10(3)(3) Enlargements or improvements in navigable waters. All inner harbors, turning basins, waterways, slips and canals created by any municipality to be used by the public for purposes of navigation, and all outer harbors connecting interior navigation with lake navigation, are declared navigable waters and are subject to the same control and regulation that navigable streams are subjected to as regards improvement, use and bridging.
30.10(4)(a)(a) This section does not impair the powers granted by law to municipalities to construct highway bridges, arches, or culverts over streams.
30.10(4)(b)(b) The boundaries of lands adjoining waters and the rights of the state and of individuals with respect to all such lands and waters shall be determined in conformity to the common law so far as applicable, but in the case of a lake or stream erroneously meandered in the original U.S. government survey, the owner of title to lands adjoining the meandered lake or stream, as shown on such original survey, is conclusively presumed to own to the actual shorelines unless it is first established in a suit in equity, brought by the U.S. government for that purpose, that the government was in fact defrauded by such survey. If the proper claims of adjacent owners of riparian lots of lands between meander and actual shorelines conflict, each shall have his or her proportion of such shorelands.
30.10(4)(c)(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, farm drainage ditches are not navigable within the meaning of this section unless it is shown that the ditches were navigable streams before ditching. For purposes of this paragraph, “farm drainage ditch” means any artificial channel which drains water from lands which are used for agricultural purposes.
30.10(4)(d)(d) A drainage district drain located in the Duck Creek Drainage District and operated by the board for that district is not navigable unless it is shown, by means of a U.S. geological survey map or other similarly reliable scientific evidence, that the drain was a navigable stream before it became a drainage district drain.
30.10 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 190, 272, 418; 1981 c. 339; 1991 a. 316; 1999 a. 9; 2003 a. 118; 2011 a. 167; 2017 a. 164.
30.10 AnnotationWhen there are two owners of land adjacent to a disputed parcel erroneously meandered under sub. (4), the judge is to divide the parcel proportionately on an equitable, but not necessarily equal, basis. Kind v. Vilas County, 56 Wis. 2d 269, 201 N.W.2d 881 (1972).
30.10 AnnotationThe Department of Natural Resources properly considered the existence of beaver dams and ponds and the periods of high water caused by spring runoffs in determining the navigability of a creek. The dams and ponds were normal and natural to the stream, and the periods of high water were of a regularly recurring, annual nature. DeGayner & Co. v. DNR, 70 Wis. 2d 936, 236 N.W.2d 217 (1975).
30.10 AnnotationAn owner of land on a meandered lake takes only to the actual shoreline. An owner does not have a “proper claim” to an isolated parcel separated from the remainder of the lot by the lake, making sub. (4) (b) inapplicable as parcels separated by a lake are not “adjacent.” State Commissioners of Board of Public Lands v. Thiel, 82 Wis. 2d 276, 262 N.W.2d 522 (1978).
30.10 AnnotationA Department of Natural Resources declaration of navigability subjecting private property to sub. (1) was a taking. Zinn v. State, 112 Wis. 2d 417, 334 N.W.2d 67 (1983).
30.10 AnnotationThe Department of Natural Resources has the authority, as well as the obligation, to determine whether the waters of the state are navigable in fact and subject to regulation under this chapter, another agency’s prior ancillary finding to the contrary notwithstanding. Turkow v. DNR, 216 Wis. 2d 273, 576 N.W.2d 288 (Ct. App. 1998), 97-1149.
30.10 AnnotationThis chapter applies to navigable ditches that were originally navigable streams. If a navigable ditch was originally nonnavigable or had no previous stream history, the Department of Natural Resources’ jurisdiction depends upon the facts of the situation. 63 Atty. Gen. 493.
30.10 AnnotationErroneously Meandered Lakeshore—The Status of the Law as it Affects Title and Distribution. Ohlander. 61 MLR 515 (1978).
30.10 AnnotationThe Muench case: A better test of navigability. Edwards. 1957 WLR 486.
30.10 AnnotationRiparian Landowners versus the Public: The Importance of Roads and Highways for Public Access to Wisconsin’s Navigable Waters. Williams. 2010 WLR 185.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1972–2018 · leading case: Zinn v. State, 334 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. 1983).
Zinn v. State, 334 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. 1983). “The 200 acres of Zinn's dry land that was declared to be within the OHWM were, according to the plaintiff's complaint, titled to the state in trust for the public pursuant to sec. 30.10(1), Stats. Because the ruling threatened Zinn with the loss of approximately 200 acres of her…”
Rock-Koshkonong Lake Dist. v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2013 WI 74 (Wis. 2013). “See Wis. Stat. § 30.10 (1) and (2) (declarations of navigability for lakes and streams).”
Vill. of Menomonee Falls v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 412 N.W.2d 505 (Wis. Ct. App. 1987). “Section 30.10, Stats., provides in pertinent part: (2) Streams.”
State v. Ryan, 2012 WI 16 (Wis. 2012). “Accordingly, the State commenced this forfeiture action alleging violations of Wis. Stat. §§ 30.10 (2) and 30.12(l)(a). 6 ¶ 16.”
Nauga, Inc. v. Westel Milwaukee Co., Inc., 576 N.W.2d 573 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “It noted the absence of any discussion about the release of claims clause (Section 30.10 in the new proposed agreement) when the new agreement was presented to a representative of Nauga at a meeting called for the purpose of explaining the new proposed agency agreement.”
State v. Bleck, 338 N.W.2d 492 (Wis. 1983). “We reach this holding by reference to sec. 30.10, Stats., which sets forth general declarations of navigability, and provides in pertinent part: “(1) Lakes.”
City of Oak Creek v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 518 N.W.2d 276 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “[A]ll streams, sloughs, bayous and marsh outlets, which are navigable in fact for any purpose whatsoever, are declared navigable to the extent that no dam, bridge or other obstruction shall be made in or over the same without the permission of the state.”
Butler v. Advanced Drainage Sys., Inc., 2005 WI App 108 (Wis. 2005). “First, in a 1994 proceeding before the DNR, based on a petition by the City for a declaratory ruling establishing an ordinary high water mark on Shell Lake pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 30.10 , the DNR made this finding: In 1977, the City of Shell Lake entered into an agreement with…”
Andersen v. Vill. of Little Chute, 549 N.W.2d 737 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “We are confident that there need be no fear that flooded backyards and street gutters will be declared navigable waters.”
Turkow v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 576 N.W.2d 288 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “Apparently, there was no further action regarding the stream until 1994 when the DNR, in response to additional citizen complaints, wrote to Turkow advising him that the stream on his property was navigable and that the walkways and steel fence placed in the stream violated §§…”
State v. Ryan, 2011 WI App 21 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “The complaint alleged, among other things, that Ryan "unlawfully placed and maintained an obstruction in the form of a sunken barge on the bed of the Menomonee River, which is a navigable stream" without a permit, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 30.10 (2) and 30.12(l)(a). 6 Ryan…”
Omernick v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 301 N.W.2d 437 (Wis. 1981). “Sec. 30.10(2), Stats. 1973, states that “[a] 11 streams, sloughs, bayous and marsh outlets, which are navigable in fact for any purpose whatsoever, are declared navigable to the extent that no dam, bridge or other obstruction shall be made in or over the same without permission…”
— Wis. Stat. § 30.10(1) — 5 cases
Zinn v. State, 334 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. 1983). “The 200 acres of Zinn's dry land that was declared to be within the OHWM were, according to the plaintiff's complaint, titled to the state in trust for the public pursuant to sec. 30.10(1), Stats. Because the ruling threatened Zinn with the loss of approximately 200 acres of her…”
Vill. of Menomonee Falls v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 412 N.W.2d 505 (Wis. Ct. App. 1987). “Section 30.10, Stats., provides in pertinent part: (2) Streams.”
State v. Bleck, 338 N.W.2d 492 (Wis. 1983). “We reach this holding by reference to sec. 30.10, Stats., which sets forth general declarations of navigability, and provides in pertinent part: “(1) Lakes.”
Andersen v. Vill. of Little Chute, 549 N.W.2d 737 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “We are confident that there need be no fear that flooded backyards and street gutters will be declared navigable waters.”
Reel Enter. v. CITY OF LAW CROSSE, 431 N.W.2d 743 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988).
— Wis. Stat. § 30.10(2) — 4 cases
City of Oak Creek v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 518 N.W.2d 276 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “[A]ll streams, sloughs, bayous and marsh outlets, which are navigable in fact for any purpose whatsoever, are declared navigable to the extent that no dam, bridge or other obstruction shall be made in or over the same without the permission of the state.”
State v. Ryan, 2012 WI 16 (Wis. 2012). “Accordingly, the State commenced this forfeiture action alleging violations of Wis. Stat. §§ 30.10 (2) and 30.12(l)(a). 6 ¶ 16.”
Omernick v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 301 N.W.2d 437 (Wis. 1981). “Sec. 30.10(2), Stats. 1973, states that “[a] 11 streams, sloughs, bayous and marsh outlets, which are navigable in fact for any purpose whatsoever, are declared navigable to the extent that no dam, bridge or other obstruction shall be made in or over the same without permission…”
Turkow v. Wisconsin Dep't of Nat. Resources, 576 N.W.2d 288 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “Apparently, there was no further action regarding the stream until 1994 when the DNR, in response to additional citizen complaints, wrote to Turkow advising him that the stream on his property was navigable and that the walkways and steel fence placed in the stream violated §§…”
— Wis. Stat. § 30.10(4) — 1 case
Muschel v. Town of Molitor, 365 N.W.2d 622 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985).
— Wis. Stat. § 30.10(4)(b) — 1 case
Com'rs of Bd. of Pub. Lands v. Thiel, 262 N.W.2d 522 (Wis. 1978).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.