Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 30.27 (2026)
Lower St
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
30.27(1)(1) Purpose. The Lower St. Croix River, between the dam near St. Croix Falls and its confluence with the Mississippi River, constitutes a relatively undeveloped scenic and recreational asset. The preservation of this unique scenic and recreational asset is in the public interest and will benefit the health and welfare of the citizens of Wisconsin. The state of Wisconsin is therefore determined that the Lower St. Croix River be included in the national wild and scenic rivers system under the wild and scenic rivers act, as amended, 16 USC 1271 to 1287, and the Lower St. Croix River act of 1972, 16 USC 1274 (a) (9). The purpose of this section is to ensure the continued eligibility of the Lower St. Croix River for inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system and to guarantee the protection of the wild, scenic and recreational qualities of the river for present and future generations.
30.27(2)(a)(a) As soon as possible after May 7, 1974, the department shall adopt, by rule, guidelines and specific standards for local zoning ordinances which apply to the banks, bluffs and bluff tops of the Lower St. Croix River. The guidelines shall designate the boundaries of the areas to which they apply. In drafting the guidelines and standards, the department shall consult with appropriate officials of counties, cities, villages and towns lying within the affected area. The standards specified in the guidelines shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
30.27(2)(a)1.1. Prohibition of new residential, commercial and industrial uses, and the issuance of building permits therefor, where such uses are inconsistent with the purposes of this section.
30.27(2)(a)2.2. Establishment of acreage, frontage and setback requirements where compliance with such requirements will result in residential, commercial or industrial uses which are consistent with the purposes of this section.
30.27(2)(b)(b) The standards established under par. (a) shall be consistent with but may be more restrictive than any pertinent guidelines and standards promulgated by the secretary of the interior under the wild and scenic rivers act. If it appears to the department that the purposes of this section may be thwarted or the wild, scenic or recreational values of the river adversely affected prior to the implementation of rules under this section, the department may exercise its emergency rule-making authority under s. 227.24, and such rules shall be effective and implemented and enforced under sub. (3) until permanent rules are implemented under sub. (3).
30.27(2)(c)(c) The guidelines and standards established under par. (a) for nonconforming structures that are subject to a city, village or town zoning ordinance adopted under sub. (3) shall be the same as the guidelines and standards for nonconforming structures that are subject to a county zoning ordinance adopted under sub. (3). The guidelines and standards established under par. (a) shall allow a county, city, village or town zoning ordinance adopted under sub. (3) to differentiate between nonconforming structures and nonconforming uses.
30.27(3)(3) Implementation. Counties, cities, villages and towns lying, in whole or in part, within the areas affected by the guidelines adopted under sub. (2) are empowered to and shall adopt zoning ordinances complying with the guidelines and standards adopted under sub. (2) within 30 days after their effective date. If any county, city, village or town does not adopt an ordinance within the time limit prescribed, or if the department determines that an adopted ordinance does not satisfy the requirements of the guidelines and standards, the department shall immediately adopt such an ordinance. An ordinance adopted by the department shall be of the same effect as if adopted by the county, city, village or town, and the local authorities shall administer and enforce the ordinance in the same manner as if the county, city, village or town had adopted it. No zoning ordinance so adopted may be modified nor may any variance therefrom be granted by the county, city, village or town without the written consent of the department, except nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a county, city, village or town from adopting an ordinance more restrictive than that adopted by the department.
30.27 AnnotationThe federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act does not preempt state and local governmental regulation of the Lower St. Croix River. The state has authority to exercise its police power in the federal zone, and this section remains in full force and effect. State v. St. Croix County, 2003 WI App 173, 266 Wis. 2d 498, 668 N.W.2d 743, 02-1645.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1996–2017 · leading case: Murr v. Wisconsin, 582 U.S. 383 (2017).
Murr v. Wisconsin, 582 U.S. 383 (2017). “” Wis. Stat. §30.27 (l) (1973). Petitioners are two sisters and two brothers in the Murr family.”
State v. St. Croix Cnty., 2003 WI App 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “Croix River in the federally administered area; the State lacks authority to regulate in the federal *501 zone; andWis. Stat. § 30.27 (2001-02), 1 which required the passage of the riverway zoning in the first instance, is no longer valid.”
Murr v. St. Croix Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2011 WI App 29 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “01; see also Wis. Stat. § 30.27 (1) (purpose is "to guarantee the protection of the wild, scenic and recreational qualities of the river for present and future generations").”
VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc. v. St. Croix Cnty., 212 F. Supp. 2d 914 (W.D. Wis. 2002). “In 1973, the Wisconsin Legislature enacted Wis.Stat. § 30.27, which required the Department of Natural Resources to adopt guidelines and specific standards for local zoning ordinances that apply to “the banks, bluffs and bluff tops of the Lower St.”
St. Croix Waterway Ass'n v. Meyer, 942 F. Supp. 435 (D. Minnesota 1996). “351; Wis.Stat.Ann. 30.27; Wis.Stat.Ann. 30.72.”
— Wis. Stat. § 30.27(1) — 1 case
Murr v. St. Croix Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2011 WI App 29 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “01; see also Wis. Stat. § 30.27 (1) (purpose is "to guarantee the protection of the wild, scenic and recreational qualities of the river for present and future generations").”
— Wis. Stat. § 30.27(2) — 2 cases
Murr v. St. Croix Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2011 WI App 29 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “01; see also Wis. Stat. § 30.27 (1) (purpose is "to guarantee the protection of the wild, scenic and recreational qualities of the river for present and future generations").”
State v. St. Croix Cnty., 2003 WI App 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “Croix River in the federally administered area; the State lacks authority to regulate in the federal *501 zone; andWis. Stat. § 30.27 (2001-02), 1 which required the passage of the riverway zoning in the first instance, is no longer valid.”
— Wis. Stat. § 30.27(3) — 2 cases
State v. St. Croix Cnty., 2003 WI App 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “Croix River in the federally administered area; the State lacks authority to regulate in the federal *501 zone; andWis. Stat. § 30.27 (2001-02), 1 which required the passage of the riverway zoning in the first instance, is no longer valid.”
Murr v. St. Croix Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2011 WI App 29 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “01; see also Wis. Stat. § 30.27 (1) (purpose is "to guarantee the protection of the wild, scenic and recreational qualities of the river for present and future generations").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.