Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 32.195 (2026)
Expenses incidental to transfer of property
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
32.19532.195 Expenses incidental to transfer of property. In addition to amounts otherwise authorized by this subchapter, the condemnor shall reimburse the owner of real property acquired for a project for all reasonable and necessary expenses incurred for:
32.195(1)(1) Recording fees, transfer taxes and similar expenses incidental to conveying such property.
32.195(2)(2) Penalty costs for prepayment of any mortgage entered into in good faith encumbering such real property if the mortgage is recorded or has been filed for recording as provided by law prior to the date specified in s. 32.19 (4) (a) 2.
32.195(3)(3) The proportional share of real property taxes paid which are allocable to a period subsequent to the date of vesting of title in the condemnor or the effective date of possession of such real property by the condemnor, whichever is earlier.
32.195(4)(4) The cost of realigning personal property on the same site in partial takings or where realignment is required by reason of elimination or restriction of existing used rights of access.
32.195(5)(5) Expenses incurred for plans and specifications specifically designed for the property taken and which are of no value elsewhere because of the taking.
32.195(6)(b)(b) The losses are shown to exceed the normal rental or vacancy experience for similar properties in the area.
32.195(7)(7) Cost of fencing reasonably necessary pursuant to s. 32.09 (6) (g) shall, when incurred, be payable in the manner described in s. 32.20.
32.195 HistoryHistory: 1973 c. 192 ss. 4, 6; 1979 c. 110 s. 60 (10); 1983 a. 236 s. 12; 1995 a. 225.
32.195 AnnotationAn owner who is legally liable for expenses incurred for plans relating to condemned property is entitled to reimbursement under sub. (5). Shepherd Legan Aldrian Ltd. v. Village of Shorewood, 182 Wis. 2d 472, 513 N.W.2d 686 (Ct. App. 1994).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Shepherd Legan Aldrian Ltd. v. Vill. of Shorewood, 513 N.W.2d 686 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
Shepherd Legan Aldrian Ltd. v. Vill. of Shorewood, 513 N.W.2d 686 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “The expenses that are currently found within § 32.195, Stats., were at one time contained within § 32.”
C. Coakley Relocation Sys., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee, 2007 WI App 209 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “19 and Wis. Stat. § 32.195 . The trial court made the following findings: I find that the City took physical possession of the property on October 14, 2002 .”
Wisconsin Fuel, LLC v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “The ALB Affidavit ¶26 Wisconsin Fuel contends that the evidence it presented on summary judgment suffices to show that its rental losses were “directly attributable” to the DOT project within the meaning of WIS.”
Pranke Holding LLC v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 32.195(6) (2017-18).1 That statute allows for reimbursement to the property owner for “[r]easonable net rental losses” incurred as a result of a taking, as long as those losses (a) “are directly attributable to the public improvement project,” and (b) “are shown to exceed the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 32.195(3) — 1 case
Shepherd Legan Aldrian Ltd. v. Vill. of Shorewood, 513 N.W.2d 686 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “The expenses that are currently found within § 32.195, Stats., were at one time contained within § 32.”
— Wis. Stat. § 32.195(5) — 1 case
Shepherd Legan Aldrian Ltd. v. Vill. of Shorewood, 513 N.W.2d 686 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “The expenses that are currently found within § 32.195, Stats., were at one time contained within § 32.”
— Wis. Stat. § 32.195(6) — 2 cases
Pranke Holding LLC v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 32.195(6) (2017-18).1 That statute allows for reimbursement to the property owner for “[r]easonable net rental losses” incurred as a result of a taking, as long as those losses (a) “are directly attributable to the public improvement project,” and (b) “are shown to exceed the…”
Wisconsin Fuel, LLC v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “The ALB Affidavit ¶26 Wisconsin Fuel contends that the evidence it presented on summary judgment suffices to show that its rental losses were “directly attributable” to the DOT project within the meaning of WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 32.195(6)(a) — 1 case
Wisconsin Fuel, LLC v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “The ALB Affidavit ¶26 Wisconsin Fuel contends that the evidence it presented on summary judgment suffices to show that its rental losses were “directly attributable” to the DOT project within the meaning of WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 32.195(6)(b) — 2 cases
Pranke Holding LLC v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 32.195(6) (2017-18).1 That statute allows for reimbursement to the property owner for “[r]easonable net rental losses” incurred as a result of a taking, as long as those losses (a) “are directly attributable to the public improvement project,” and (b) “are shown to exceed the…”
Wisconsin Fuel, LLC v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “The ALB Affidavit ¶26 Wisconsin Fuel contends that the evidence it presented on summary judgment suffices to show that its rental losses were “directly attributable” to the DOT project within the meaning of WIS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.