Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 33.60 (2026)
Budget proposals
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
33.60(1)(a)(a) The commission’s fiscal year shall commence July 1 of each year and end June 30 of the following year. Annually, the board of commissioners shall prepare a proposed budget for the commission’s activities, plans, programs, or projects under this subchapter.
33.60(1)(b)2.2. A list of all proposed appropriations for each activity and reserve account for the upcoming year.
33.60(1)(b)6.6. A list, by fund, of all anticipated unexpended or unappropriated balances and all surpluses.
33.60(1)(c)(c) The commission shall publish as a class 1 notice under ch. 985 in Racine County and in Waukesha County, at least 15 days before the public hearing, a summary of the budget, a notice of the place where a copy of the budget is located for public inspection and a notice of the time and place for a public hearing on the budget.
33.60(1)(d)(d) The summary required under par. (c) shall include all of the following for the proposed budget, for the budget in effect and for the budget of the preceding year, if applicable:
33.60(2)(2) Not less than 15 days after publication of the summary of the budget and of the notices required under sub. (1) (c), the board of commissioners shall hold a public hearing at the time and place specified in the notice. At the hearing, any resident or taxpayer of a river county shall have the opportunity to be heard on the proposed budget. The budget hearing may be adjourned from time to time. At the hearing, the board of commissioners may adopt changes to the budget.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1994–1994 · leading case: K.G.R. v. Town of East Troy, 513 N.W.2d 622 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
K.G.R. v. Town of East Troy, 513 N.W.2d 622 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “2d at 91 (quoting 11 Eugene McQuillin, A Treatise on The Law of Municipal Corporations § 33.60, at 750 (3rd ed.). The court then reasoned: The reservations were made by the Conrad heirs for their benefit and for the benefit of persons acquiring tracts from them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.