Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 4 — SENATE AND ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 4.06 (2026)

Sixth assembly district

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
4.064.06 Sixth assembly district. All of the following territory constitutes the 6th assembly district:
4.06(1)(1) Whole county. Menominee.
4.06(2)(2) Brown County. That part of Brown County consisting of all of the following:
4.06(2)(a)(a) The town of Pittsfield.
4.06(2)(b)(b) That part of the village of Pulaski located in the county.
4.06(3)(3) Oconto County. That part of Oconto County consisting of all of the following:
Down
Up
4.06(3)(a)(a) The towns of Breed, Chase, Gillett, How, Morgan, and Underhill.
4.06(3)(b)(b) The village of Suring.
4.06(3)(c)(c) That part of the village of Pulaski located in the county.
4.06(3)(d)(d) The city of Gillett.
4.06(4)(4) Shawano County. That part of Shawano County consisting of all of the following:
4.06(4)(a)(a) The towns of Angelica, Bartelme, Belle Plaine, Green Valley, Hartland, Herman, Lessor, Maple Grove, Navarino, Pella, Red Springs, Richmond, Seneca, Washington, Waukechon, and Wescott.
4.06(4)(b)(b) The villages of Bonduel, Bowler, Cecil, and Gresham.
4.06(4)(c)(c) That part of the village of Pulaski located in the county.
4.06(4)(d)(d) The city of Shawano.
4.06(5)(5) Waupaca County. That part of Waupaca County consisting of all of the following:
4.06(5)(a)(a) The towns of Larrabee and Matteson.
4.06(5)(b)(b) The village of Embarrass.
4.06(5)(c)(c) The city of Clintonville.
4.06 HistoryHistory: 2023 a. 94.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). · cites it 2× “, Municipal Code §§ 4.06(1)(a) and (b), 4.06(2)(a) and (b) (providing such things as one or two-family dwellings as a permitted use and providing such things as home occupations, involving the conduct of business on the premises, as a conditional use).”
Miller Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 427 F. Supp. 1192 (W.D. Wis. 1977). “Gonda, Trademark Law and Practice, § 4.06 at 77 (1963): Generally speaking, if the mark imparts information directly, it is descriptive.”
Bakery Bling v. Matrix Packaging Mach. LLC (E.D. Wis. 2022). “See 1 Moore’s AnswerGuide: Fed Civil Motion Practice § 4.06 (“A court deciding a motion opposing venue has discretion over whether or not to hold an evidentiary hearing.”
Thomas Krupenkin v. Jennifer Mnookin (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “05 (discussing the requirements of “[a]dequate due process” for a “faculty member whose dismissal is sought,” but not stating any requirements with respect to the composition of the hearing body); § 4.06 (discussing “[p]rocedural guarantees” that “[a]ny hearing held shall comply…”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.06(1)(a) — 1 case
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). “, Municipal Code §§ 4.06(1)(a) and (b), 4.06(2)(a) and (b) (providing such things as one or two-family dwellings as a permitted use and providing such things as home occupations, involving the conduct of business on the premises, as a conditional use).”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.06(l)(a) — 1 case
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). “, Municipal Code §§ 4.06(1)(a) and (b), 4.06(2)(a) and (b) (providing such things as one or two-family dwellings as a permitted use and providing such things as home occupations, involving the conduct of business on the premises, as a conditional use).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.