Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 4.28 (2026)

Twenty-eighth assembly district

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

4.284.28 Twenty-eighth assembly district. All of the following territory constitutes the 28th assembly district:

4.28(1)(1) Dunn County. That part of Dunn County consisting of all of the following:

4.28(1)(a)(a) The towns of Eau Galle, Lucas, Stanton, and Weston.

4.28(1)(b)(b) The villages of Downing and Knapp.

4.28(2)(2) Pierce County. That part of Pierce County consisting of all of the following:

4.28(2)(a)(a) The towns of Gilman, Martell, and Spring Lake.

4.28(2)(b)(b) The village of Elmwood.

4.28(2)(c)(c) That part of the village of Spring Valley located in the county.

4.28(3)(3) St. Croix County. That part of St. Croix County consisting of all of the following:

4.28(3)(a)(a) The towns of Baldwin, Cady, Cylon, Eau Galle, Emerald, Erin Prairie, Forest, Glenwood, Hammond, Pleasant Valley, Richmond, Rush River, Somerset, Springfield, Stanton, Star Prairie, and Warren.

4.28(3)(b)(b) The villages of Baldwin, Deer Park, Hammond, Roberts, Somerset, Star Prairie, Wilson, and Woodville.

4.28(3)(c)(c) That part of the village of Spring Valley located in the county.

4.28(3)(d)(d) The cities of Glenwood City and New Richmond.

4.28 HistoryHistory: 2023 a. 94.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2006 · leading case: Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. Jones, 2006 WI 53 (Wis. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. Jones, 2006 WI 53 (Wis. 2006). · cites it 24× “Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 4.28, at 581 (3d ed. 2004); 7 Perillo, supra note 16, § 29.”

Smart v. Dane Cnty. Bd. of Adjustments, 501 N.W.2d 782 (Wis. 1993). · cites it 2× “Anderson, American Law of Zoning 3d § 4.28 (1986). Smart's argument really boils down to the fact that he wishes to benefit from a mistake of the Zoning Department in 1969.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.