Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 448.09 (2026)
Penalties; appeal
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
448.09(1)(1) Penalties. A person who violates s. 448.08 (3) may be fined not more than $250. Except as provided in sub. (1m), a person who violates any other provision of this subchapter may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 9 months or both.
448.09(1m)(1m) Physicians. A physician who violates any provision of this subchapter, except s. 448.08 (3), or any rule promulgated under this subchapter may be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned not more than 9 months or both.
448.09(2)(2) Appeal. Any person aggrieved by any action taken under this subchapter by the board, its officers or its agents may apply for judicial review as provided in ch. 227, and shall file notice of such appeal with the secretary of the board within 30 days. No court of this state may enter an ex parte stay of any action taken by the board under this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1984–1990 · leading case: Gilbert v. State, Med. Examining Bd., 349 N.W.2d 68 (Wis. 1984).
Gilbert v. State, Med. Examining Bd., 349 N.W.2d 68 (Wis. 1984). “Further, we find that sec. 448.09(2), Stats. 1975, provides that a party aggrieved by any Board action taken under ch.”
Sweet v. State Med. Examining Bd., 433 N.W.2d 614 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “5 Section 448.09(2), Stats., allows a person aggrieved by the Board’s action to seek judicial review as provided in ch.”
Maleki v. Fine-Lando Clinic Chartered, S.C., 453 N.W.2d 208 (Wis. Ct. App. 1990). “Sec. 448.09(1), Stats. 5 Although extensive evidence of the alleged fee-splitting aspects of the Fine-Lando/Co arrangement was admitted over the defendants' objection, the special verdict did not ask whether the arrangement violated sec.”
— Wis. Stat. § 448.09(1) — 1 case
Maleki v. Fine-Lando Clinic Chartered, S.C., 453 N.W.2d 208 (Wis. Ct. App. 1990). “Sec. 448.09(1), Stats. 5 Although extensive evidence of the alleged fee-splitting aspects of the Fine-Lando/Co arrangement was admitted over the defendants' objection, the special verdict did not ask whether the arrangement violated sec.”
— Wis. Stat. § 448.09(2) — 2 cases
Gilbert v. State, Med. Examining Bd., 349 N.W.2d 68 (Wis. 1984). “Further, we find that sec. 448.09(2), Stats. 1975, provides that a party aggrieved by any Board action taken under ch.”
Sweet v. State Med. Examining Bd., 433 N.W.2d 614 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “5 Section 448.09(2), Stats., allows a person aggrieved by the Board’s action to seek judicial review as provided in ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.