Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 448.62 (2026)
Applicability
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
448.62(1)(1) A person lawfully practicing within the scope of a license, permit, registration or certification granted by this state or the federal government.
448.62(2)(2) A person assisting a podiatrist in practice under the direct, on-premises supervision of the podiatrist.
448.62(2m)(2m) An advanced practice registered nurse who is providing nonsurgical patient services as directed, supervised, and inspected by a podiatrist who has the power to direct, decide, and oversee the implementation of the patient services rendered.
Effective date noteNOTE: Sub. (2m) is shown as amended eff. 9-1-26 by 2025 Wis. Act 17. Prior to 9-1-26 it reads:
Effective date text(2m) An advanced practice nurse who is certified to issue prescription orders under s. 441.16 and who is providing nonsurgical patient services as directed, supervised, and inspected by a podiatrist who has the power to direct, decide, and oversee the implementation of the patient services rendered.
448.62(3)(3) A podiatry student engaged in activities required for his or her education or training.
448.62(4)(4) A podiatrist who is licensed to practice podiatry in another state or country and is providing a consultation or demonstration with a podiatrist who is licensed under this subchapter.
448.62(7)(7) A physician assistant who is acting under the supervision and direction of a podiatrist, subject to s. 448.975 (2) (a) 2m., or an individual to whom the physician assistant delegates a task or order under s. 448.975 (4).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: Christmas v. Dr. Donald W. Hugar, Ltd., 949 N.E.2d 675 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
Christmas v. Dr. Donald W. Hugar, Ltd., 949 N.E.2d 675 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “" Wis. Stat. § 448.62 (2006). Plaintiff argues that because Dr.”
Christmas v. Hugar (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “” Wis. Stat. § 448.62 (2006). Plaintiff argues that because Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.