Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 59.33 (2026)

Powers after term

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
59.3359.33Powers after term.
59.33(1)(1)Every undersheriff and deputy sheriff, compensated for services by fees or by part salary and part fees, may execute and return all writs, processes and orders in their hands at the expiration of the sheriff’s term of office and which the undersheriff or deputy sheriff has, before that time, begun to execute by service, levy, advertisement or the collection of money thereon.
59.33(2)(2)In counties where the compensation of sheriffs, undersheriffs and deputies has been changed from the fee to the salary system, the sheriff, immediately upon the expiration of the sheriff’s term, shall turn over to the sheriff’s successor all writs, processes and orders in the hands of the sheriff, or in the hands of the undersheriff or deputies, whether or not such writs, processes and orders have been partly or fully executed or returned, and such successor shall execute and return or complete the execution and return of such writs, processes and orders.
59.33(3)(3)In case of a vacancy in the office of sheriff, of any county, the undersheriff and deputies then in office having then any writ, process or order in their hands shall have the same authority and be under the same obligation to serve, execute and return the same as if the sheriff had continued in office.
59.33 HistoryHistory: 1987 a. 181; 1991 a. 316; 1995 a. 201 s. 295.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Cramer v. Eau Claire Cnty., 2013 WI App 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013).
Cramer v. Eau Claire Cnty., 2013 WI App 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “" See Wis. Stat. § 59.33 (l)-(2). While our references to sheriff Cramer in this decision are generally inclusive of treasurer Lokken, the analysis in this paragraph clearly does not apply to Lokken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.