Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 6.05 (2026)
Election day age determines elector’s rights
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
6.056.05 Election day age determines elector’s rights. Any person who will be 18 years old on or before election day is entitled to vote if the person complies with this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1970–2017 · leading case: Bruguier v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 237 F. Supp. 3d 867 (W.D. Wis. 2017).
Bruguier v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 237 F. Supp. 3d 867 (W.D. Wis. 2017). “Section 6.05 of the L.D.F. Business Development’s charter has a similar “sue and be sued” clause, but makes clear that a waiver of sovereign immunity requires a unanimous vote of all of its directors.”
Town of Washington v. City of Altoona, 243 N.W.2d 404 (Wis. 1976). “02 and sec. 6.05, Stats.] or upwards, belonging to either of the following classes, who shall have resided in the state for one year [the residency requirement has been changed to six months pursuant to sec.”
Ziolkowski v. Caterpillar, Inc., 800 F. Supp. 767 (E.D. Wis. 1992). “FACTS Pursuant to Local Rule 6, § 6.05, the Defendant has submitted a list of proposed findings of fact.”
Kupferschmidt v. Runyon, 827 F. Supp. 570 (E.D. Wis. 1993). “FACTS In compliance with Local Rule 6, § 6.05, the movant has proposed the following findings which the court finds are supported by the record: 1.”
Cross v. Hebl, 174 N.W.2d 737 (Wis. 1970). “This view is accepted by sec. 6.05, Stats., which provides, “Any person who will be 21 years old on or before election day is entitled to vote if he complies with ch.”
Superview Network, Inc. v. SuperAmerica, 827 F. Supp. 1392 (E.D. Wis. 1993). “The court's determination of whether any material facts are in dispute has been made more difficult because the parties have not complied with Local Rule 6, § 6.05 by setting forth undisputed facts in a stipulation or in numbered paragraphs limited to single factual propositions.”
Matter of Zahn, 452 F. Supp. 1341 (E.D. Wis. 1978). “§ 6.05[2] at p. 810: The rule is now well settled that the bankruptcy court has no jurisdiction to enforce a lien or claim upon exempt property and that such matters must be litigated, usually in the state courts.”
Hanselman v. Fiedler, 822 F. Supp. 1342 (E.D. Wis. 1993). “Further, in cases in which a party appears pro se, Local Rules § 6.05 requires that the movant submit either a stipulation of facts or proposed findings of fact and that the nonmovant respond specifically, within thirty (30) days, to those proposed findings of fact which it…”
McNally v. Tollander, 294 N.W.2d 660 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “02 and sec. 6.05, Stats.] or upwards, belonging to either of the following classes, who shall have resided in the state for one year [the residence requirement has been changed to ten days pursuant to sec.”
Akbar v. Borgen, 803 F. Supp. 1479 (E.D. Wis. 1992). “Section 6.05(b). [Mjaterials in opposition to a motion [for summary judgment] must be filed within 30 days' from service of the motion____ In the absence of a response from the plaintiff to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the court, is required to accept as true the…”
Denil v. Deboer, Inc., 748 F. Supp. 2d 967 (W.D. Wis. 2010). “#41-13, § 6.05(c). Section 5.02 of the stock purchase agreement obligated all parties to the agreement to use their “best efforts” to cause fulfillment of the conditions precedent to the obligations of plaintiffs.”
Davidson v. Wisconsin Nat. Gas Co., 986 F. Supp. 539 (E.D. Wis. 1997). “See Local Rule 6, § 6.05. I. FACTS The following facts, proposed by Wisconsin Natural Gas Company (WN), are uneontest-ed: 1.”
— Wis. Stat. § 6.05(b) — 1 case
Akbar v. Borgen, 803 F. Supp. 1479 (E.D. Wis. 1992). “Section 6.05(b). [Mjaterials in opposition to a motion [for summary judgment] must be filed within 30 days' from service of the motion____ In the absence of a response from the plaintiff to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the court, is required to accept as true the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 6.05(c) — 1 case
Denil v. Deboer, Inc., 748 F. Supp. 2d 967 (W.D. Wis. 2010). “#41-13, § 6.05(c). Section 5.02 of the stock purchase agreement obligated all parties to the agreement to use their “best efforts” to cause fulfillment of the conditions precedent to the obligations of plaintiffs.”
— Wis. Stat. § 6.05(d) — 1 case
Hanselman v. Fiedler, 822 F. Supp. 1342 (E.D. Wis. 1993). “Further, in cases in which a party appears pro se, Local Rules § 6.05 requires that the movant submit either a stipulation of facts or proposed findings of fact and that the nonmovant respond specifically, within thirty (30) days, to those proposed findings of fact which it…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.