Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 645.64 (2026)
Special provisions for 3rd-party claims
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
645.64(1)(1) Third party’s claim. Whenever any 3rd party asserts a cause of action against an insured of an insurer in liquidation, the 3rd party may file a claim with the liquidator. The filing of the claim shall release the insured’s liability to the 3rd party on that cause of action in the amount of the applicable policy limit, but the liquidator shall also insert in any form used for the filing of 3rd-party claims appropriate language to constitute such a release. The release shall be void if the insurance coverage is avoided by the liquidator.
645.64(2)(2) Insured’s claim. Whether or not the 3rd party files a claim, the insured may file a claim on his or her own behalf in the liquidation. If the insured fails to file a claim by the date for filing claims specified in the order of liquidation or within 60 days after mailing of the notice required by s. 645.47 (1) (b), whichever is later, the insured is an unexcused late filer.
645.64(3)(a)(a) The liquidator shall make recommendations to the court under s. 645.71 for the allowance of an insured’s claim under sub. (2) after consideration of the probable outcome of any pending action against the insured on which the claim is based, the probable damages recoverable in the action and the probable costs and expenses of defense. After allowance by the court, the liquidator shall withhold any dividends payable on the claim, pending the outcome of litigation and negotiation with the insured. Whenever it seems appropriate, the liquidator shall reconsider the claim on the basis of additional information and amend the recommendations to the court. The insured shall be afforded the same notice and opportunity to be heard on all changes in the recommendation as in its initial determination. The court may amend its allowance as it thinks appropriate.
645.64(3)(b)(b) As claims against the insured are settled or barred, the insured shall be paid from the amount withheld the same percentage dividend as was paid on other claims of like priority, based on the lesser of the following:
645.64(3)(b)1.1. The amount actually recovered from the insured by action or paid by agreement plus the reasonable costs and expenses of defense.
645.64(3)(c)(c) After all claims are settled or barred, any sum remaining from the amount withheld shall revert to the undistributed assets of the insurer. Delay in final payment under this subsection shall not be a reason for unreasonable delay of final distribution and discharge of the liquidator.
645.64(4)(4) Multiple claims. If several claims founded upon one policy are filed, whether by 3rd parties or as claims by the insured under this section, and the aggregate allowed amount of the claims to which the same limit of liability in the policy is applicable exceeds that limit, each claim as allowed shall be reduced in the same proportion so that the total equals the policy limit. Claims by the insured shall be evaluated as in sub. (3). If any insured’s claim is subsequently reduced under sub. (3), the amount thus freed shall be apportioned ratably among the claims that have been reduced under this subsection.
645.64 AnnotationThird parties and insureds are not required to file their claims with the liquidator. Riley v. Heil Co., 624 F. Supp. 695 (1985).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1985–2006 · leading case: Koken v. Reliance Ins., 893 A.2d 70 (Pa. 2006).
Koken v. Reliance Ins., 893 A.2d 70 (Pa. 2006). “Wis. Stat. § 645.64 (1) (Comments L. 1967, C.”
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 56 — 9—323(b)(1) excuses the failure to file a proof of claim before the deadline when the claimant was not aware of the existence of the claim and files a proof of claim as soon as possible after learning about it.”
Riley v. Heil Co., 624 F. Supp. 695 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “Wis.Stat. § 645.64, comment. Wis.Stat. § 645.”
Peterson v. Minden Beef Co., 434 N.W.2d 681 (Neb. 1989). “The committee comment found in the annotation sets out the rationale for the provision and states: This section provides for the third party claimant to make a choice between pursuing his claim against the insured and presenting his claim in the liquidation.”
Allianz Underwriters Ins. v. Crescent Garage, Inc., 426 N.W.2d 104 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “We turn to the effect of sec. 645.64, Stats., on Allianz’s claim against Crescent.”
— Wis. Stat. § 645.64(1) — 3 cases
Koken v. Reliance Ins., 893 A.2d 70 (Pa. 2006). “Wis. Stat. § 645.64 (1) (Comments L. 1967, C.”
Riley v. Heil Co., 624 F. Supp. 695 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “Wis.Stat. § 645.64, comment. Wis.Stat. § 645.”
Allianz Underwriters Ins. v. Crescent Garage, Inc., 426 N.W.2d 104 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “We turn to the effect of sec. 645.64, Stats., on Allianz’s claim against Crescent.”
— Wis. Stat. § 645.64(2) — 1 case
Riley v. Heil Co., 624 F. Supp. 695 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “Wis.Stat. § 645.64, comment. Wis.Stat. § 645.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.