Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 68.001 (2026)
Legislative purpose
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
68.00168.001 Legislative purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to afford a constitutionally sufficient, fair and orderly administrative procedure and review in connection with determinations by municipal authorities which involve constitutionally protected rights of specific persons which are entitled to due process protection under the 14th amendment to the U.S. constitution.
68.001 AnnotationDiscussing investigatory and adjudicatory functions in administrative proceedings. State ex rel. DeLuca v. Common Council, 72 Wis. 2d 672, 242 N.W.2d 689 (1976).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Ottman v. Town of Primrose, 2011 WI 18 (Wis. 2011).
Ottman v. Town of Primrose, 2011 WI 18 (Wis. 2011). “Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . Based on the parties' stipulation, the circuit court remanded the matter to the Town Board for Chapter 68 review.”
Hanlon v. Town of Milton, 2000 WI 61 (Wis. 2000). “Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . 5 *604 Although we agree that litigants can raise constitutional objections to municipal determination in certiorari review, we do not agree that a claim for money damages based upon § 1983 may be brought in this forum.”
Koenig v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 2016 WI App 23 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). “" See Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . Construing the fifteen-day time limit in Wis.”
Guerrero v. City of Kenosha Hous. Auth., 2011 WI App 138 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “Guerrero argues that equitable relief is required in order to fulfill the stated purpose of Wis. Stat. § 68.001 to provide a constitutionally sufficient and fair procedure and review of agency decisions.”
Jay M. H. v. Winnebago Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 2006 WI App 66 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “13 unambiguously provides authority for the remand of the agency final order for further proceedings necessary to insure the legislative purpose set forth in Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . Accordingly, we next address whether the circuit court had authority to remand the Wis.”
James D. Hanlon v. Town of Milton, Town Bd. of Milton, William Cunningham, 186 F.3d 831 (7th Cir. 1999). “” Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . Section 68.01 provides that “[a]ny person having a substantial interest which is adversely affected by an administrative determination of a governing .”
Collins v. City of Kenosha Hous. Auth., 2010 WI App 110 (Wis. Ct. App. 2010). “" See Wis. Stat. § 68.001 . Thus, any alleged actions contrary to the procedural requirements of ch.”
Kness v. City of Kenosha, Wis., 669 F. Supp. 1484 (E.D. Wis. 1987). “Section 68.001 reads, The purpose of this chapter is to afford a constitutionally sufficient, fair and orderly administrative procedure and review in connection with determinations by municipal authorities which involve constitutionally protected rights of specific persons which…”
Donald Isherwood v. Portage Cnty. Drainage Dist. (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “§§ 68.001, 68.13—which define the mode and scope of judicial review of 22 No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.