Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 68.08 (2026)
Request for review of determination
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
68.0868.08 Request for review of determination. Any person aggrieved may have a written or oral determination reviewed by written request mailed or delivered to the municipal authority which made such determination within 30 days of notice to such person of such determination. The request for review shall state the ground or grounds upon which the person aggrieved contends that the decision should be modified or reversed. A request for review shall be made to the officer, employee, agent, agency, committee, board, commission or body who made the determination but failure to make such request to the proper party shall not preclude the person aggrieved from review unless such failure has caused prejudice to the municipal authority.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Oneida Seven Generations Corp. v. City of Green Bay, 2015 WI 50 (Wis. 2015).
Oneida Seven Generations Corp. v. City of Green Bay, 2015 WI 50 (Wis. 2015). “8 ¶33 Oneida Seven filed for an administrative appeal under Wis. Stat. §§ 68.08 , 68.10 and 68.11, requesting review and a 8 There was a significant change in the makeup of the Common Council between the time the Council initially approved the conditional use permit and the time…”
Edith Milestone v. City of Monroe, 665 F.3d 774 (7th Cir. 2011). “See Wis. Stat. §§ 68.08 , 68.09(1). Specifically, chapter 68 provides that the official who made the initial determination may conduct the review, or “an independent review of such initial determination by another person, committee or agency of the municipality may be provided.”
Koenig v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 2016 WI App 23 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 68.08 allows any person aggrieved by a written or oral decision of a municipality 7 to request a review of that determination within thirty days.”
Zelman v. Town of Erin, 917 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “§§ 68.08 and 68.09. ¶ 29 The parties (and the Majority) appear to agree that we are not operating under WIS.”
City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of Waukesha, 604 N.W.2d 870 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “See § 68.08, Stats. The municipal authority then has fifteen days to conduct its review.”
Jay M. H. v. Winnebago Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 2006 WI App 66 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “filed a Wis. Stat. § 68.08 request for a review of the DHSS child abuse substantiation determination, and he was afforded an evidentiary hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).”
Oneida Seven Generations Corp. v. City of Green Bay (Wis. 2015). “8 ¶33 Oneida Seven filed for an administrative appeal under Wis. Stat. §§ 68.08 , 68.10 and 68.11, requesting review and a 8 There was a significant change in the makeup of the Common Council between the time the Council initially approved the conditional use permit and the time…”
Van Handel v. Pritzl, 922 N.W.2d 319 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “Although Van Handel argued the variance had an economic impact on him, the circuit court concluded he had failed to establish that he was "aggrieved" as that term is defined in the statute.”
Apys Cars, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 68.08. Specifically, the circuit court found that the City did not “opt out” of the administrative obligations of WIS.”
Benjean F. Lara v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. Ct. App. 2026). “§ 68.08. Lara petitioned for the independent review, in which the medical evidence and reports in the record were reviewed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.