Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 68.12 (2026)

Final determination

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
68.1268.12Final determination.
68.12(1)(1)Within 20 days of completion of the hearing conducted under s. 68.11 and the filing of briefs, if any, the decision maker shall mail or deliver to the appellant its written determination stating the reasons therefor. Such determination shall be a final determination.
68.12(2)(2)A determination following a hearing substantially meeting the requirements of s. 68.11 or a decision on review under s. 68.09 following such hearing shall also be a final determination.
68.12 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 295.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Zelman v. Town of Erin, 917 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018).
Zelman v. Town of Erin, 917 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 17× “See Wis. Stat. § 68.12 (2). Section 68.11 hearings allow for, among other things, the appellant and the municipal authority to "present evidence and call and examine [sworn] witnesses.”
Jay M. H. v. Winnebago Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 2006 WI App 66 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 13× “2 The ALJ affirmed the DHSS substantiation of abuse determination and issued a Wis. Stat. § 68.12 (1) final determination.”
Margaret Pulera v. Town of Richmond, 2017 WI 61 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 5× “§ 68.12 explains when a determination is final under municipal administrative proceedings.”
Edith Milestone v. City of Monroe, 665 F.3d 774 (7th Cir. 2011). “Wis. Stat. §§ 68.12 (2), 68.13(1). 3 . In this kind of First Amendment claim, Supreme Court doctrine calls for stricter or looser judicial scrutiny depending on the nature of the “forum” in which the regulations apply.”
City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of Waukesha, 604 N.W.2d 870 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 3× “See § 68.12(1), Stats. The appellant may then seek judicial review by certiorari within thirty days of receipt of the final determination.”
Koenig v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 2016 WI App 23 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 68.12(2) expressly states that the decision of an administrative panel following a hearing conducted under Wis.”
Benjean F. Lara v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “§ 68.12. ¶9 Lara requested an administrative appeal hearing, which was conducted by the IHE over two dates: January 12, 2023 and March 2, 2023.”
— Wis. Stat. § 68.12(1) — 3 cases
Zelman v. Town of Erin, 917 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “See Wis. Stat. § 68.12 (2). Section 68.11 hearings allow for, among other things, the appellant and the municipal authority to "present evidence and call and examine [sworn] witnesses.”
City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of Waukesha, 604 N.W.2d 870 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “See § 68.12(1), Stats. The appellant may then seek judicial review by certiorari within thirty days of receipt of the final determination.”
Benjean F. Lara v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. Ct. App. 2026). “§ 68.12. ¶9 Lara requested an administrative appeal hearing, which was conducted by the IHE over two dates: January 12, 2023 and March 2, 2023.”
— Wis. Stat. § 68.12(2) — 2 cases
Zelman v. Town of Erin, 917 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “See Wis. Stat. § 68.12 (2). Section 68.11 hearings allow for, among other things, the appellant and the municipal authority to "present evidence and call and examine [sworn] witnesses.”
Koenig v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 2016 WI App 23 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 68.12(2) expressly states that the decision of an administrative panel following a hearing conducted under Wis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.