Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 703.37 (2026)

Interpretation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
703.37703.37Interpretation. For purposes of interpretation of this chapter, a condominium is a form of ownership, not a form of land use, and is not a subdivision as defined in ch. 236.
703.37 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 407; 2003 a. 283.
703.37 NoteNOTE: 2003 Wis. Act 283, which affected this section, contains extensive explanatory notes.
703.37 AnnotationCondominiums are not a form of land use. A condominium unit set aside for commercial use runs afoul of a zoning ordinance prohibiting commercial use. When an intended commercial use did not comport with a town’s zoning restrictions, approval of the condominium by the town was de facto rezoning. A town could not seek to avoid the restrictions of applicable extraterritorial zoning by aiming to define its action as something other than a zoning change. Village of Newburg v. Town of Trenton, 2009 WI App 139, 321 Wis. 2d 424, 773 N.W.2d 500, 08-2997.
703.37 AnnotationIn this case, when restrictive covenants stated that a tract of land may not be divided so as to create any additional tracts, the defendants’ attempt to convert the tract into a condominium comprised of three units violated the unambiguous terms of the restrictive covenants by dividing the tract into additional tracts. Nothing in the plain language of this section prevents a restrictive covenant from treating a condominium conversion as a division of land distinct from a subdivision, as that term is used in ch. 236. Nordstrom v. Kane, 2021 WI App 71, 399 Wis. 2d 522, 966 N.W.2d 91, 20-1942.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: FAS, LLC v. Town of Bass Lake, 2007 WI 73 (Wis. 2007).
FAS, LLC v. Town of Bass Lake, 2007 WI 73 (Wis. 2007). · cites it 15× “" Wis. Stat. § 703.37 . ¶ 30 The State argues that Wis.”
State Ex Rel. Vill. of Newburg v. Town of Trenton, 2009 WI App 139 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “As explained in a practice guide for Wisconsin lawyers published by the State Bar of Wisconsin, 6 condominiums are not a form of land use, see Wis. Stat. § 703.37 , so "a change in zoning — or other approval under a zoning ordinance — should not be required for condominium…”
Stephan B. Nordstrom v. Steven G. Kane, 2021 WI App 71 (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 6× “§ 703.37, which states: “For purposes of interpretation of this chapter, a condominium is a form of ownership, not a form of land use, and is not a subdivision as defined in [WIS.”
Glenn Bluemer v. Brian Young (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§§ 703.37; 703.05; 703.04. The plat and declarations required to form a condominium constitute a written document affecting land, the construction of which is a question of law that we review independently without deference to the circuit court’s interpretation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.