Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 752.01 (2026)
Jurisdiction
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
752.01 AnnotationThe court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain an original action unrelated to its supervisory or appellate authority over circuit courts. State ex rel. Swan v. Elections Board, 133 Wis. 2d 87, 394 N.W.2d 732 (1986).
752.01 AnnotationJurisdiction of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. Hazeltine. 69 MLR 545 (1986).
752.01 AnnotationA Shift in the Bottleneck: The Appellate Caseload Problem Twenty Years After the Creation of The Wisconsin Court of Appeals. Gabrys. 1998 WLR 1547.
752.01 AnnotationWisconsin Court of Appeals: 1983 internal operating procedures. WBB Nov. 1983.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1979–2010 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. State, 2003 WI 30 (Wis. 2003).
State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. State, 2003 WI 30 (Wis. 2003). “Wisconsin Constitution, Article VII, Section 5(3) provides: The appeals court shall have such appellate jurisdiction in the district, including jurisdiction to review administrative proceedings, as the legislature may provide by law, but shall have no original jurisdiction other…”
State v. Henley, 2010 WI 97 (Wis. 2010). “" Wis. Stat. § 752.01 (l)-(2). Therefore, a motion seeking a new trial under § 752.”
State Ex Rel. Swan v. Elections Bd., 394 N.W.2d 732 (Wis. 1986). “" This limitation is reflected in sec. 752.01(2), Stats., which provides, "The court of appeals has original jurisdiction only to issue prerogative writs.”
State Ex Rel. James L.J. v. Circuit Court for Walworth Cnty., 546 N.W.2d 460 (Wis. 1996). “6 See also Wis. Stat. § 752.01 , which provides as follows: Jurisdiction.”
State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine Cnty., 472 N.W.2d 532 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991). “2d 5, 9 (1968); sec. 752.01(2), Stats. The issuance of a writ is controlled by equitable principles and, in our discretion, we can consider the rights of the public and third parties.”
State Ex Rel. Gilboy v. Circuit Court for Waukesha Cnty., 349 N.W.2d 712 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “] Section 752.01, Stats., provides: Jurisdiction.”
State Ex Rel. Collins v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 451 N.W.2d 429 (Wis. 1990). “5; sec. 752.01, Stats., 1987-88; sec. 752.02, Stats.”
Rohl v. State, 279 N.W.2d 731 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Sec. 752.01(3), Stats. Therefore, we feel we have the jurisdiction and authority to grant the defendant’s request for bail pending a new trial.”
State ex rel. Eau Claire Leader-Telegram v. Barrett, 436 N.W.2d 885 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “1 *772 Now, pursuant to sec. 752.01(2), Stats., the newspaper requests this court to exercise its jurisdiction and award attorney fees allowed under successful mandamus actions.”
Schoenhofen v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 605 N.W.2d 249 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, 1975, with §§ 752.01(1), 808.01(1) and 808.03, Stats.”
— Wis. Stat. § 752.01(1) — 1 case
Schoenhofen v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 605 N.W.2d 249 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, 1975, with §§ 752.01(1), 808.01(1) and 808.03, Stats.”
— Wis. Stat. § 752.01(2) — 3 cases
State Ex Rel. Swan v. Elections Bd., 394 N.W.2d 732 (Wis. 1986). “" This limitation is reflected in sec. 752.01(2), Stats., which provides, "The court of appeals has original jurisdiction only to issue prerogative writs.”
State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine Cnty., 472 N.W.2d 532 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991). “2d 5, 9 (1968); sec. 752.01(2), Stats. The issuance of a writ is controlled by equitable principles and, in our discretion, we can consider the rights of the public and third parties.”
State ex rel. Eau Claire Leader-Telegram v. Barrett, 436 N.W.2d 885 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “1 *772 Now, pursuant to sec. 752.01(2), Stats., the newspaper requests this court to exercise its jurisdiction and award attorney fees allowed under successful mandamus actions.”
— Wis. Stat. § 752.01(3) — 1 case
Rohl v. State, 279 N.W.2d 731 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Sec. 752.01(3), Stats. Therefore, we feel we have the jurisdiction and authority to grant the defendant’s request for bail pending a new trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.