Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (2026)

Venue

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
752.21752.21Venue.
752.21(1)(1)Except as provided in sub. (2), a judgment or order appealed to the court of appeals shall be heard in the court of appeals district which contains the court from which the judgment or order is appealed.
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document

Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Search in this agency
Search in this chapter group
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations
Administrative Code Index

Reference lines
Clear highlighting
752.21(2)(2)A judgment or order appealed from an action venued in a county designated by the plaintiff to the action as provided under s. 801.50 (3) (a) shall be heard in a court of appeals district selected by the appellant but the court of appeals district may not be the court of appeals district that contains the court from which the judgment or order is appealed.
752.21 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 187; 2011 a. 61.
752.21 AnnotationA plaintiff designates the county for circuit court venue within the meaning of s. 801.50 (3) (a) when the plaintiff specifies venue. For purposes of sub. (2), even when s. 227.53 (1) (a) 3. eliminates any opportunity to choose a county, the plaintiff still designates venue within the meaning of s. 801.50 (3) (a). State ex rel. DNR v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2018 WI 25, 380 Wis. 2d 354, 909 N.W.2d 114, 16-1980.
752.21 AnnotationIn this case, the lawsuit clearly related to the validity or invalidity of a rule or guidance document within the meaning of s. 801.50 (3) (b). It was likewise clear that the lawsuit remained within the confines of s. 801.50 (3) (b) even though the plaintiff sought injunctive relief in addition to declaratory relief. Because the claim for injunctive relief was completely dependent upon a favorable decision on the claim for declaratory relief, the action was quintessentially one for declaratory relief. Thus, venue was not also proper under s. 801.50 (3) (a) and did not trigger the appellate venue-shifting provision of sub. (2). State ex rel. Kormanik v. Brash, 2022 WI 67, 404 Wis. 2d 568, 980 N.W.2d 948, 22-1736.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Dist. IV, 909 N.W.2d 114 (Wis. 2018).
Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Dist. IV, 909 N.W.2d 114 (Wis. 2018). · cites it 45× “2016AP1980-W ¶2 We accepted review because this case presents an important issue of first impression regarding the right of an appellant to select appellate venue under Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (2) (2015-16).1 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE ¶3 The dispute giving rise to…”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash, 2022 WI 67 (Wis. 2022). · cites it 12× “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
Timothy Zignego v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2020 WI App 17 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 752.21(2). 6 That statutory subpart provides in relevant part: Upon receipt of reliable information that a registered elector has changed his or her residence to a location outside of the municipality, the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners shall notify the…”
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com. v. Tony Evers, 2021 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 752.21(2) (2019-20). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted.”
Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Dep't of Just., 2024 WI App 38 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “This appeal follows. DISCUSSION 7 All references to WIS.”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash, 2022 WI 67 (Wis. 2022). · cites it 12× “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash (Wis. 2022). · cites it 12× “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
DEKK Prop. Dev., LLC v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp. (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 752.21(2). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted.”
Amazon Logistics, Inc. v. LIRC (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “Thus, for ease of reading, when LIRC has adopted the Department’s arguments on appeal, we refer to the arguments of the Department.”
Sierra Club v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Wisconsin (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “However, we will “set aside agency action or remand the case to the agency” if we conclude that “the agency’s action depends on any finding of fact that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” Id. “An agency’s findings are supported by substantial evidence if a…”
Wisconsin State Legislature v. Josh Kaul (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “12 This court determined that the Legislature’s Notice of Appeal to the District II Court of Appeals was filed before the Attorney General’s Notice of Appeal to District IV or Jarchow’s Notice of Appeal to District II.”
— Wis. Stat. § 752.21(1) — 3 cases
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash, 2022 WI 67 (Wis. 2022). “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash, 2022 WI 67 (Wis. 2022). “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash (Wis. 2022). “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
— Wis. Stat. § 752.21(2) — 11 cases
Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Dist. IV, 909 N.W.2d 114 (Wis. 2018). “2016AP1980-W ¶2 We accepted review because this case presents an important issue of first impression regarding the right of an appellant to select appellate venue under Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (2) (2015-16).1 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE ¶3 The dispute giving rise to…”
Timothy Zignego v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2020 WI App 17 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 752.21(2). 6 That statutory subpart provides in relevant part: Upon receipt of reliable information that a registered elector has changed his or her residence to a location outside of the municipality, the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners shall notify the…”
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com. v. Tony Evers, 2021 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 752.21(2) (2019-20). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted.”
Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Dep't of Just., 2024 WI App 38 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “This appeal follows. DISCUSSION 7 All references to WIS.”
Nancy Kormanik v. William Brash, 2022 WI 67 (Wis. 2022). “¶7 The letter memoranda subsequently filed by the parties addressed the following statutes (2019-20): Wis. Stat. § 752.21 (1) Except as provided in sub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.