Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 79.02 (2026)

Shared revenue distributions

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

79.0279.02 Shared revenue distributions.

79.02(1)(1) Except as provided in sub. (2) (b), the department of administration, upon certification by the department of revenue, shall distribute shared revenue payments to each municipality and county on the 4th Monday in July and the 3rd Monday in November.

79.02(2)(2)

79.02(2)(a)(a) In this subsection, “estimated payments” means the amounts in the statement provided to the county or municipality under s. 79.015.

79.02(2)(b)(b) Subject to ss. 59.605 (4) and 70.995 (14) (b), payments in July shall equal 15 percent of the municipality’s or county’s estimated payments under ss. 79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, and 79.04 and 100 percent of the municipality’s estimated payments under s. 79.05. Upon certification by the department of revenue, the estimated payment under s. 79.05 may be distributed before the 4th Monday in July.

79.02(3)(3) Subject to s. 59.605 (4), payments to each municipality and county in November shall equal that municipality’s or county’s entitlement under ss. 79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, 79.04, and 79.05 for the current year, minus the amount distributed to the municipality or county under sub. (2) (b).

79.02 HistoryHistory: 1983 a. 27; 1985 a. 29 ss. 1505p, 1505t, 3202 (46); 1985 a. 120; 1987 a. 27; 1989 a. 336; 1991 a. 307; 1993 a. 16; 1999 a. 150 s. 672; 2001 a. 109; 2003 a. 33, 170, 320; 2005 a. 254; 2009 a. 28; 2011 a. 32; 2021 a. 1; 2023 a. 12.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker, 2014 WI 99 (Wis. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker, 2014 WI 99 (Wis. 2014). · cites it 4× “See Wis. Stat. §§ 79.02 , 79.035. ¶228 The shared revenue program does not show a relationship between city contributions to city employee pension plans and the State budget.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.