Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 8.13 (2026)
Commission city primary
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
8.138.13 Commission city primary. At the first primary after adoption of the commission form of government the 2 candidates for mayor and the 4 candidates for council members receiving the highest number of votes shall be nominated. At subsequent primaries the 2 candidates receiving the most votes for either office shall be nominated. Only the names of the nominees shall appear on the spring election ballot.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1956–2025 · leading case: Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC, 920 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 2018).
Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC, 920 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 2018). “¶14 Section 8.13 contains a "Covenant Not to Compete," which details, among other things, a restriction that the doctors practice in their specialty for a designated period of time, in a specified area, and at particular facilities.”
State v. Adrean L. Smith, 2014 WI 88 (Wis. 2014). “I, § 8.13 In order to protect suspects from the "inherently compelling pressures" of custodial interrogation, the United States Supreme Court has developed procedural guidelines to be followed by police during such interrogations.”
Presser v. United States, 218 F. Supp. 108 (E.D. Wis. 1963). “), Section 8.13, pp. 1704-1705: “ * * * While the Rules have substituted ‘claim’ or ‘claim for relief’ in lieu of the older and troublesome term ‘cause of action,’ the pleading still must state a ‘cause of action’ in the sense that it must show ‘that the pleader is entitled to…”
Janke Constr. Co., Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co., 386 F. Supp. 687 (W.D. Wis. 1974). “2A, § 8.13, p. 1695: “The courts have recognized that the function of pleadings under the Federal Rules is to give fair notice of the claim asserted so as to enable the adverse party to answer and prepare for trial, to allow for the application of the doctrine of res judicata,…”
Rogers v. Dwight, 145 F. Supp. 537 (E.D. Wis. 1956). ““Under the ‘notice’ theory of pleading it is immaterial whether a pleading states ‘conclusions’ or ‘facts’ as long as fair notice is given, * * * ” 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 8.13. 3. Defendants contend that Count I of the complaint shows on its *539 face that the cause of…”
Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC (Wis. 2018). “Pannu personally signed the Ancillary Restrictive Covenant containing similar terms to Section 8.13 of the Operating Agreement. The Ancillary Restrictive Covenant, however, did not specifically incorporate by reference Section 13.”
Stephenson v. Childrens Hosp. of Wisconsin Inc (E.D. Wis. 2023). “1980) (quoting Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.13, 8– 124, 125 (2d ed. 1979) and citing Atwood v.”
Kamala v. Target (E.D. Wis. 2024). “1980) (quoting MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 8.13, 8–124, 125 (2d ed. 1979) and citing Atwood v.”
Coleman (E.D. Wis. 2025). “1980) (quoting MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 8.13, 8–124, 125 (2d ed. 1979) and citing Atwood v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.