Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (2026)
Appeals
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
879.27(1)(1) Appeal is to the court of appeals. Any person aggrieved by any appealable order or judgment of the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction may appeal or take a writ of error therefrom to the court of appeals.
879.27(2)(2) Effect of chs. 801 to 847. In all matters not otherwise provided for in this chapter relating to appeals from courts assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction to the court of appeals, the law and rules of practice of chs. 801 to 847 govern.
879.27(4)(4) Who may appeal on behalf of minor or individual adjudicated incompetent. In all cases the appeal on behalf of any minor or individual adjudicated incompetent may be taken and prosecuted by the guardian of the minor’s or individual’s estate or by a guardian ad litem.
879.27(5)(5) Limitation on bond and costs. On appeals from courts assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction to the court of appeals no bond may be required of, or costs awarded against, any alleged incompetent individual or person acting in behalf of an alleged incompetent individual on an appeal from an adjudication of incompetency, and no bond may be required of any personal representative, guardian, or trustee of a testamentary trust.
879.27 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 783 (1975); 1977 c. 187, 449; 1979 c. 89; 1983 a. 219; 1993 a. 486; 2005 a. 387.
879.27 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1983: Sub. (3) providing an appeal deadline of 60 days from entry of order or judgment in probate proceedings, has been repealed for greater uniformity. An appeal must be initiated within the time period specified in s. 808.04 (1). [Bill 151-S]
879.27 AnnotationA memorandum decision in a probate proceeding was treated as an order terminating the proceeding and therefore appealable although no separate order was entered when it appeared that the memorandum decision was clearly intended to be a final ruling. Boerner v. Boerner, 46 Wis. 2d 183, 174 N.W.2d 457 (1970).
879.27 AnnotationThe agents of an incompetent named in the incompetent’s health care and durable power of attorney documents had standing to appeal under sub. (1). Because they were agents under these two documents, they were substitutes for the incompetent for purposes of sub. (1). Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, 251 Wis. 2d 10, 640 N.W.2d 773, 00-0929.
879.27 AnnotationFinal orders and final judgments in probate cases should state that they are final for the purposes of an appeal, if that is the intention of the parties involved and of the circuit court. Sanders v. Estate of Sanders, 2008 WI 63, 310 Wis. 2d 175, 750 N.W.2d 806, 06-0424.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2002 WI 27 (Wis. 2002).
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2002 WI 27 (Wis. 2002). “We determine that the Knights have standing to appeal under Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1) *17 (1999-2000) [2] as agents under health care and durable power of attorney documents.”
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2001 WI App 147 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “After discussing the effect of Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1), which provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any appealable order or judgment of the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction may appeal or take a writ of error therefrom to the court of appeals," the motions…”
Winiarski v. Vill. at Manor Park, 2008 WI App 7 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “Winiarski further argues that as her agent at the time of the guardianship proceedings, he was improperly barred from the proceedings and further, he has standing to make this appeal on Florence's behalf because at the time of the petition proceedings he was her agent.”
Kenneth Brown v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2025 WI 5 (Wis. 2025). “¶13 “Aggrieved” is a term of art often used in Wisconsin statutes granting parties the right to appeal certain decisions.”
Kenneth Brown v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2025 WI 5 (Wis. 2025). “¶13 “Aggrieved” is a term of art often used in Wisconsin statutes granting parties the right to appeal certain decisions.”
Waukesha Cnty. DH&HS v. M. A. S. (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 879.27. Knight I, 246 8 No. 2022AP877 Wis.”
— Wis. Stat. § 879.27(1) — 3 cases
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2002 WI 27 (Wis. 2002). “We determine that the Knights have standing to appeal under Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1) *17 (1999-2000) [2] as agents under health care and durable power of attorney documents.”
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2001 WI App 147 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “After discussing the effect of Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1), which provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any appealable order or judgment of the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction may appeal or take a writ of error therefrom to the court of appeals," the motions…”
Winiarski v. Vill. at Manor Park, 2008 WI App 7 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “Winiarski further argues that as her agent at the time of the guardianship proceedings, he was improperly barred from the proceedings and further, he has standing to make this appeal on Florence's behalf because at the time of the petition proceedings he was her agent.”
— Wis. Stat. § 879.27(4) — 2 cases
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2002 WI 27 (Wis. 2002). “We determine that the Knights have standing to appeal under Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1) *17 (1999-2000) [2] as agents under health care and durable power of attorney documents.”
Knight v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2001 WI App 147 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “After discussing the effect of Wis. Stat. § 879.27 (1), which provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any appealable order or judgment of the court assigned to exercise probate jurisdiction may appeal or take a writ of error therefrom to the court of appeals," the motions…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.