Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 889.11 (2026)

Reporter’s transcript as evidence

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
889.11889.11Reporter’s transcript as evidence. Any writing certified by the official reporter of any court to have been carefully compared by the reporter with the reporter’s minutes of testimony and proceedings taken on any trial or hearing in such court, and to be a true and correct transcript of all or a specified portion of such minutes, and to be a correct statement of the evidence and proceedings had on such trial or hearing, shall be received in evidence with the same effect as the oral testimony of such reporter to the facts so certified.
889.11 HistoryHistory: 1993 a. 486.
889.11 AnnotationA partial transcript included in the appeal record by stipulation of the parties could not be considered competent evidence since it did not include a certification by a shorthand reporter. Fells v. State, 65 Wis. 2d 525, 223 N.W.2d 507 (1974).
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document

Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Search in this agency
Search in this chapter group
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations
Administrative Code Index

Reference lines
Clear highlighting
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1993 · leading case: Fells v. State, 223 N.W.2d 507 (Wis. 1974).
Fells v. State, 223 N.W.2d 507 (Wis. 1974). · cites it 3× “Moreover, the transcript is not presented as part of any affidavit and does not bear the imprimatur of any shorthand reporter verifying the accuracy as required by sec. 889.11, Stats. 17 Without *541 such certification the partial transcript cannot be considered competent…”
Gen. Tel. Co. of Wisconsin v. Auto-Owners Ins., 409 N.W.2d 133 (Wis. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Section 889.11, Stats. 5 Section 752.35, Stats.”
Hansen v. Crown Controls Corp., 512 N.W.2d 509 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “03; and sec. 889.11, Stats. Crown's remedy was in a motion to correct the record, not ellipses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.