Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 939.12 (2026)

Crime defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
939.12939.12Crime defined. A crime is conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. Conduct punishable only by a forfeiture is not a crime.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1962–2025 · leading case: State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 12× “" Wis. Stat. § 939.12 . 5 Conduct punishable only by a forfeiture is *876 not a crime.”
State v. Delaney, 2003 WI 9 (Wis. 2003). · cites it 6× “Wis. Stat. § 939.12 defines a crime as "conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
State v. Smith, 2005 WI 104 (Wis. 2005). · cites it 7× “We began our analysis in McAllister by noting the definition of "crime" provided for by the legislature in Wis. Stat. § 939.12 . Id. at 535 . Section 939.”
State v. Hauk, 2002 WI App 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 7× “" Although the definition of crime in Wis. Stat. § 939.12 applies explicitly only in chs.”
State v. Courtney C. Beamon, 2013 WI 47 (Wis. 2013). · cites it 4× “10 (abolishing common law crimes); Wis. Stat. § 939.12 (defining crime as "conduct which is prohibited by state law").”
State v. Daniel S. Iverson, 2015 WI 101 (Wis. 2015). · cites it 4× “81 (2), (2m) (violation of littering statute punishable by forfeiture), with Wis. Stat. § 939.12 ("Conduct punishable only by a forfeiture is not a crime"), and Wis.”
State v. Campbell, 2002 WI App 20 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 7× “The term "crime" is defined in Wis. Stat. § 939.12 as "conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
Dane Cnty. v. McGrew, 2005 WI 130 (Wis. 2005). · cites it 4× “60(2)-(3m); see also Wis. Stat. § 939.12 ("A crime is conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
State v. Carpenter, 508 N.W.2d 69 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 18× “[3] Between the enactment of sec. 939.12, Stats., in 1955, see sec. 1, ch.”
State v. Rabe, 291 N.W.2d 809 (Wis. 1980). · cites it 2× “In support of his argument, the defendant points out that a crime is defined in sec. 939.12, Stats., [12] as conduct, not the resulting consequences of conduct.”
State v. Albright, 298 N.W.2d 196 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “” Section 939.12 provides: “[a] crime is conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
State v. Church, 589 N.W.2d 638 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “" Section 939.12, STATS. (Emphasis added.) [9] We conclude that there is no basis on which we might conclude that the legislature intended more than a single punishment for a single act of enticement of a single child, thus confirming our preliminary conclusion that the two…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.