Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 940.47 (2026)
Court orders
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
940.47940.47 Court orders. Any court with jurisdiction over any criminal matter, upon substantial evidence, which may include hearsay or the declaration of the prosecutor, that knowing and malicious prevention or dissuasion of any person who is a victim or who is a witness has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, may issue orders including but not limited to any of the following:
940.47(2)(2) An order that a person before the court other than a defendant, including, but not limited to, a subpoenaed witness or other person entering the courtroom of the court, not violate ss. 940.42 to 940.45.
940.47(3)(3) An order that any person described in sub. (1) or (2) maintain a prescribed geographic distance from any specified witness or victim.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: State v. Anderson, 580 N.W.2d 329 (Wis. 1998).
State v. Anderson, 580 N.W.2d 329 (Wis. 1998). “45; court orders and penalties for prevention or dissuasion of a victim or witness in a criminal matter, Wis. Stat. §§ 940.47 and 940.48. [2] "[I]t is a precept of justice that punishment for a crime should be graduated and proportioned to the offense.”
State v. Orlik, 595 N.W.2d 468 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “Although § 940.47, Stats., does authorize a court to enter such orders if the standards of that statute are met, we do not remand for a determination under that statute because Orlik is no longer incarcerated while awaiting trial.”
State v. Aaron L. Jacobs (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 940.47. Further, WIS. STAT. § 940.49 subjects defendants released under WIS.”
Love v. Clarke, 563 F. App'x 486 (7th Cir. 2014). “Wis. Stat. § 940.47 . Prison and jail officials enforced the order by moving Love to maximum-security areas as he awaited trial for more than two years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.