Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 947.012 (2026)

Unlawful use of telephone

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
947.012947.012Unlawful use of telephone.
947.012(1)(1)Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor:
947.012(1)(a)(a) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse or harass, makes a telephone call and threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to any person or the property of any person.
947.012(1)(b)(b) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten or abuse, telephones another and uses any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious act.
947.012(1)(c)(c) Makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, without disclosing his or her identity and with intent to abuse or threaten any person at the called number.
947.012(2)(2)Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture:
947.012(2)(a)(a) With intent to harass or offend, telephones another and uses any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious act.
947.012(2)(b)(b) Makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number.
947.012(2)(c)(c) Makes repeated telephone calls, whether or not conversation ensues, with intent solely to harass any person at the called number.
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document

Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Search in this agency
Search in this chapter group
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations
Administrative Code Index

Reference lines
Clear highlighting
947.012(2)(d)(d) Makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, without disclosing his or her identity and with intent to harass any person at the called number.
947.012(2)(e)(e) Knowingly permits any telephone under his or her control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.
947.012 HistoryHistory: 1979 c. 131; 1991 a. 39.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: State v. Schwebke, 2002 WI 55 (Wis. 2002).
State v. Schwebke, 2002 WI 55 (Wis. 2002). · cites it 4× “See Wis. Stat. §§ 947.012 and 947.013. Schwebke contends that, by creating these separate and more narrowly tailored provisions, the legislature intended any harassing conduct, like the conduct in this case, to be charged under this provision, not under the broad language of the…”
State v. Warbelton, 2009 WI 6 (Wis. 2009). · cites it 2× “6 This case was consolidated with two other criminal cases against Warbelton, alleging three counts of bail jumping and two violations of a domestic abuse order.”
State v. Warbelton, 2008 WI App 42 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “Count Two alleged that on October 31,2003, Warbelton committed telephone harassment, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 947.012 (l)(a). Count Three alleged that on February 22, 2004, Warbelton committed disorderly conduct, in violation of Wis.”
State v. Dawson, 536 N.W.2d 119 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “; one count of unlawful use of a telephone, contrary to § 947.012, Stats.; and one count of bail jumping, contrary to § 946.”
State v. McKellips, 2015 WI App 31 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “In addition to creating Wis. Stat. § 947.0125 , 1995 Wis. Act 353 also grouped the new statute together with the existing Wis.”
Wisconsin Prof'l Police Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 179 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “" In addition, under § 947.012(2)(d) , "Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: .”
State v. Nienhardt, 537 N.W.2d 123 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “Nienhardt was charged with ten counts of unlawful use of a telephone contrary to § 947.012(1), STATS., as a result of harassing telephone calls she made to Judith Kilmer.”
State v. Jefferson, 471 N.W.2d 274 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991). “, and use of the telephone to threaten to inflict injury or physical harm is a potential violation of sec. 947.012(1), Stats. Thus, there was sufficient evidence before the trial court to find that Jefferson was dangerous to himself and others, and therefore, as a matter of law,…”
State v. Burrows, 925 N.W.2d 789 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 947.012(1)(b), and defamation, in violation of WIS.”
State v. Heyer, 496 N.W.2d 779 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “(1989-90), and making harassing phone calls, sec. 947.012(4), Stats. (1989-90), and arose from incidents in 1989.”
Off. of Lawyer Reg. v. Schwitzer, 2017 WI 53 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 2× “The complaint alleged that on February 4, 2014, Attorney Schwitzer was convicted in Brown County of unlawful phone use - threatens harm, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 947.012 (l)(a), a Class B misdemeanor; Possession of THC, in violation of Wis.”
State v. Christopher W. Yakich (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 947.012(1) (providing that unlawful use of a telephone is a Class B misdemeanor); WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(1) — 3 cases
State v. Nienhardt, 537 N.W.2d 123 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “Nienhardt was charged with ten counts of unlawful use of a telephone contrary to § 947.012(1), STATS., as a result of harassing telephone calls she made to Judith Kilmer.”
State v. Jefferson, 471 N.W.2d 274 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991). “, and use of the telephone to threaten to inflict injury or physical harm is a potential violation of sec. 947.012(1), Stats. Thus, there was sufficient evidence before the trial court to find that Jefferson was dangerous to himself and others, and therefore, as a matter of law,…”
State v. Christopher W. Yakich (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 947.012(1) (providing that unlawful use of a telephone is a Class B misdemeanor); WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Gillie Robinson (Wis. Ct. App. 2025).
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. Burrows, 925 N.W.2d 789 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 947.012(1)(b), and defamation, in violation of WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(2)(d) — 1 case
Wisconsin Prof'l Police Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 179 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “" In addition, under § 947.012(2)(d) , "Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: .”
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(4) — 1 case
State v. Heyer, 496 N.W.2d 779 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “(1989-90), and making harassing phone calls, sec. 947.012(4), Stats. (1989-90), and arose from incidents in 1989.”
— Wis. Stat. § 947.012(l)(c) — 1 case
Wisconsin Prof'l Police Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 179 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “" In addition, under § 947.012(2)(d) , "Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.