Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (2026)

Return of property frozen or seized

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

968.20968.20 Return of property frozen or seized.

968.20(1)(1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property frozen or seized under s. 971.109 or seized pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant, except for an animal taken into custody under s. 173.13 (1) or withheld from its owner under s. 173.21 (1) (a), may apply for its return to the circuit court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant was returned, except that a court may commence a hearing, on its own initiative, to return property seized under s. 968.26. If an initial appearance under s. 970.01 is scheduled, the application for the return of the property shall be filed within 120 days of the initial appearance.

968.20(1g)(1g) The court shall order such notice as it deems adequate to be given the district attorney and, unless notice was provided under s. 968.26 (7), to all persons who have or may have an interest in the property. The court shall hold a hearing to hear all claims to its true ownership. Except for a hearing commenced by the court, the hearing shall occur no more than 30 days after a motion is filed except that either party may, by agreement or for good cause, move the court for one extension of no more than 10 days. Any motion may be supported by affidavits or other submissions. If the right to possession is proved to the court’s satisfaction, it shall order the property, other than contraband or property covered under sub. (1m) or (1r) or s. 173.21 (4) or 968.205, returned if the court finds any of the following:

968.20(1g)(a)(a) It is likely that the final judgment will be that the state must return the property to the claimant and the property is not reasonably needed as evidence or for other investigatory reasons or, if needed, satisfactory arrangements can be made for its return for subsequent use.

968.20(1g)(am)(am) The property is the only reasonable means for a defendant to pay for legal representation in the forfeiture or criminal proceeding, the property is not likely to be needed for payment of victim compensation, restitution, or fines, and the property is not reasonably needed as evidence or for other investigatory reasons. If the court makes this finding, it may order the return of funds or property sufficient to obtain legal counsel but less than the total amount seized and require an accounting.

968.20(1g)(b)(b) All proceedings and investigations in which it might be required have been completed.

968.20(1h)(1h) If a court orders property returned under sub. (1g), the court shall order the person not to sell, transfer, assign, or otherwise encumber the property until the court orders the property returned under s. 961.55 (3) or 973.075 (5), forfeited under s. 961.555 or 973.076, or subject to restitution under s. 973.20. If the person is subsequently convicted of or found to have committed the offense, the court shall order the person to surrender the returned property for proceedings under s. 961.555 or 973.076, whichever is appropriate, or for restitution under s. 973.20.

968.20(1m)(1m)

968.20(1m)(a)(a) In this subsection:

968.20(1m)(a)1.1. “Crime” includes an act committed by a juvenile or by an adult who is adjudicated incompetent that would have been a crime if the act had been committed by a competent adult.

968.20(1m)(a)2.2. “Dangerous weapon” has the meaning given in s. 939.22 (10).

968.20(1m)(b)(b) If the seized property is a dangerous weapon or ammunition, the property shall not be returned to any person who committed a crime involving the use of the dangerous weapon or the ammunition.

968.20(1m)(c)(c) Subject to par. (d), seized property that is a dangerous weapon or ammunition may be returned to the rightful owner under this section if the owner had no prior knowledge of and gave no consent to the commission of the crime.

968.20(1m)(d)(d)

968.20(1m)(d)1.1. If the seized property is a firearm, the property has not been returned under this section, and a person claiming the right to possession of the firearm has applied for its return under sub. (1), the court shall order a hearing under sub. (1) to occur within 20 business days after the person applies for the return. If, at the hearing, all conditions under sub. (1) have been met and the person is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under state or federal law as determined by using information provided under s. 165.63, the court shall, within 5 days of the completion of the hearing and using a return of firearms form developed by the director of state courts, order the property returned if one of the following has occurred:

968.20(1m)(d)1.a.a. The district attorney has affirmatively declined to file charges in connection with the seizure against the person.

968.20(1m)(d)1.b.b. All charges filed in connection with the seizure against the person have been dismissed.

968.20(1m)(d)1.c.c. Ten months have passed since the seizure and no charges in connection with the seizure have been filed against the person.

968.20(1m)(d)1.d.d. The trial court has reached final disposition for all charges in connection with the seizure and the person has not been adjudged guilty, or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, of a crime in connection with the seizure.

968.20(1m)(d)1.e.e. The person has established that he or she had no prior knowledge of and gave no consent to the commission of the activity that led to the seizure.

968.20(1m)(d)2.2. If an entity holding a seized firearm receives a return of firearms form, the entity shall return the firearm within 10 business days of receiving the form unless the entity determines that the person who would receive the firearm is prohibited from possessing a firearm under state or federal law. The entity shall use the information provided under s. 165.63 to aid in making the determination under this subdivision.

968.20(1m)(e)(e) Property which may not be returned to an owner under this subsection shall be disposed of under subs. (3) and (4).

968.20(1r)(1r)

968.20(1r)(a)(a) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1., 2007 stats., the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1., 2007 stats., has been canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 2. or (16) (gm), 2007 stats., or is canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1m. c.

968.20(1r)(b)(b) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1., the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1. is canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1m. c.

968.20(1r)(c)(c) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 1., the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 1. is canceled under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 2. c.

968.20(1r)(d)(d) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 1., the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 1. is canceled under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 2. c.

968.20(1r)(e)(e) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 55.12 (10) (a), the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 55.12 (10) (a) is canceled under s. 55.12 (10) (b) 3.

968.20(2)(2) Property not required for evidence or use in further investigation, unless contraband or property covered under sub. (1m) or (1r) or s. 173.12 or 968.205, may be returned by the officer to the person from whom it was seized without the requirement of a hearing.

968.20(3)(3)

968.20(3)(a)(a) First class cities shall dispose of dangerous weapons or ammunition seized 12 months after taking possession of them if the owner, authorized under sub. (1m), has not requested their return and if the dangerous weapon or ammunition is not required for evidence or use in further investigation and has not been disposed of pursuant to a court order at the completion of a criminal action or proceeding. Disposition procedures shall be established by ordinance or resolution and may include provisions authorizing an attempt to return to the rightful owner any dangerous weapons or ammunition which appear to be stolen or are reported stolen. If enacted, any such provision shall include a presumption that if the dangerous weapons or ammunition appear to be or are reported stolen an attempt will be made to return the dangerous weapons or ammunition to the authorized rightful owner. If the return of a seized dangerous weapon other than a firearm is not requested by its rightful owner under sub. (1) and is not returned by the officer under sub. (2), the city shall safely dispose of the dangerous weapon or, if the dangerous weapon is a motor vehicle, as defined in s. 340.01 (35), sell the motor vehicle following the procedure under s. 973.075 (4) or authorize a law enforcement agency to retain and use the motor vehicle. If the return of a seized firearm or ammunition is not requested by its authorized rightful owner under sub. (1) and is not returned by the officer under sub. (2), the seized firearm or ammunition shall be shipped to and become property of the state crime laboratories. A person designated by the department of justice may destroy any material for which the laboratory has no use or arrange for the exchange of material with other public agencies. In lieu of destruction, shoulder weapons for which the laboratories have no use shall be turned over to the department of natural resources for sale and distribution of proceeds under s. 29.934 or for use under s. 29.938.

968.20(3)(b)(b) Except as provided in par. (a) or sub. (1m) or (4), a city, village, town or county or other custodian of a seized dangerous weapon or ammunition, if the dangerous weapon or ammunition is not required for evidence or use in further investigation and has not been disposed of pursuant to a court order at the completion of a criminal action or proceeding, shall make reasonable efforts to notify all persons who have or may have an authorized rightful interest in the dangerous weapon or ammunition of the application requirements under sub. (1). If, within 30 days after the notice, an application under sub. (1) is not made and the seized dangerous weapon or ammunition is not returned by the officer under sub. (2), the city, village, town or county or other custodian may retain the dangerous weapon or ammunition and authorize its use by a law enforcement agency, except that a dangerous weapon used in the commission of a homicide or a handgun, as defined in s. 175.35 (1) (b), may not be retained. If a dangerous weapon other than a firearm is not so retained, the city, village, town or county or other custodian shall safely dispose of the dangerous weapon or, if the dangerous weapon is a motor vehicle, as defined in s. 340.01 (35), sell the motor vehicle following the procedure under s. 973.075 (4). If a firearm or ammunition is not so retained, the city, village, town or county or other custodian shall ship it to the state crime laboratories and it is then the property of the laboratories. A person designated by the department of justice may destroy any material for which the laboratories have no use or arrange for the exchange of material with other public agencies. In lieu of destruction, shoulder weapons for which the laboratory has no use shall be turned over to the department of natural resources for sale and distribution of proceeds under s. 29.934 or for use under s. 29.938.

968.20(4)(4) Any property seized, other than property covered under s. 968.205, that poses a danger to life or other property in storage, transportation or use and that is not required for evidence or further investigation shall be safely disposed of upon command of the person in whose custody they are committed. The city, village, town or county shall by ordinance or resolution establish disposal procedures. Procedures may include provisions authorizing an attempt to return to the rightful owner substances which have a commercial value in normal business usage and do not pose an immediate threat to life or property. If enacted, any such provision shall include a presumption that if the substance appears to be or is reported stolen an attempt will be made to return the substance to the rightful owner.

968.20 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 260; 1977 c. 449 s. 497; 1979 c. 221; 1981 c. 160; 1983 a. 189 s. 329 (3); 1983 a. 278; 1985 a. 29 ss. 2447 to 2449, 3200 (35); 1987 a. 203; 1987 a. 332 s. 64; 1993 a. 90, 196; 1996 a. 157; 1997 a. 192, 248; 1999 a. 185; 2001 a. 16; 2005 a. 387, 394; 2009 a. 258; 2011 a. 257 s. 56; 2015 a. 64, 141, 233; 2017 a. 211, 365; 2021 a. 76.

968.20 AnnotationA claimant of seized property has the burden of showing that it is not contraband and is not needed as evidence in a possible retrial. Money may be applied to the payment of counsel fees. Welter v. Sauk County Clerk of Court, 53 Wis. 2d 178, 191 N.W.2d 852 (1971).

968.20 AnnotationUnder sub. (1m) (b), “rightful owner” refers to an innocent person who owned a firearm or ammunition at the time an offense was committed. State v. Williams, 148 Wis. 2d 852, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1989).

968.20 AnnotationDiscussing whether explicit photographs seized during the execution of a search warrant were contraband. State v. Benhoff, 185 Wis. 2d 600, 518 N.W.2d 307 (Ct. App. 1994).

968.20 AnnotationIn the event that the district attorney elects not to bring a forfeiture action against seized property, a person seeking the return of the property may do so under this section, not s. 961.55 (3). State v. Jones, 226 Wis. 2d 565, 594 N.W.2d 738 (1999), 97-3306.

968.20 AnnotationThe definition of contraband in s. 968.13 applies to this section. The burden is on the state to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence that property is contraband not subject to return under this section. State v. Jones, 226 Wis. 2d 565, 594 N.W.2d 738 (1999), 97-3306.

968.20 AnnotationThe term “use” in sub. (1m) (b) requires more than the mere fact that a firearm is with a person. It must be part of the crime in some way. State v. Perez, 2000 WI App 115, 235 Wis. 2d 238, 612 N.W.2d 374, 99-3108.

968.20 AnnotationThis section establishes an in rem proceeding to establish true ownership of property. It does not authorize granting a money judgment to the rightful owner when seized property is missing or mistakenly returned to another as a judgment in an in rem proceeding is valid only against the property and not against a defendant or a defendant’s assets. City of Milwaukee v. Glass, 2001 WI 61, 243 Wis. 2d 636, 628 N.W.2d 343, 99-2389.

968.20 AnnotationSub. (1m) (b) prohibits the return of a dangerous weapon to a person convicted of carrying a concealed and dangerous weapon. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, 244 Wis. 2d 582, 628 N.W.2d 820, 99-3108.

968.20 AnnotationSub. (1m) (b) is subject to the excessive fines clause of the 8th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. State v. Bergquist, 2002 WI App 39, 250 Wis. 2d 792, 641 N.W.2d 179, 01-0814.

968.20 AnnotationSub. (1m) (b) forbids returning weapons to one who committed a crime involving their use; it does not require that the defendant be convicted of that crime. Agreeing to a crime being read in at the time of sentencing constitutes an admission of having committed the crime. When charged with possession of a firearm by a person ordered not to possess a firearm under an injunction, a defendant need not have them literally in the defendant’s hands or on premises that the defendant occupies but must have the right to possess them. Not having contact with the weapons for several years did not establish lack of possession, especially when the defendant was allowing the firearms to appreciate for later sale. State v. Kueny, 2006 WI App 197, 296 Wis. 2d 658, 724 N.W.2d 399, 04-1291.

968.20 AnnotationWhen the defendant’s conduct resulting in the defendant’s conviction for disorderly conduct involved the use of a single firearm, the circuit court properly denied the defendant’s motion for the return of that gun under sub. (1m) (b). However, with respect to other guns and ammunition that were seized following the incident, those items were not used in the commission of the disorderly conduct offense, and sub. (1m) (b) did not bar their return. State v. Leonard, 2015 WI App 57, 364 Wis. 2d 491, 868 N.W.2d 186, 14-2892.

968.20 AnnotationNothing in this section provides a creditor with the right to obtain a debtor’s property in a proceeding under this section. A circuit court does not have the inherent authority to take property unassociated with the crime at issue and allocate that property to itself or others solely because the police happened to have seized the unassociated property at the time of arrest. This section does not provide for equitable relief. State v. Branch, 2015 WI App 65, 364 Wis. 2d 582, 869 N.W.2d 542, 14-2515.

968.20 AnnotationA law enforcement agency may not retain unclaimed contraband money for its own use. In the absence of an asset forfeiture proceeding initiated by the state or a judicial determination that the money constitutes contraband, a local law enforcement agency should dispose of the money as unclaimed property under s. 59.66 (2). OAG 10-09.

968.20 AnnotationDue process does not require states to give detailed instructions to owners who seek the return of lawfully seized property no longer needed in a police interrogation or criminal proceeding. City of West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234, 119 S. Ct. 678, 142 L. Ed. 2d 636 (1999).

968.20 AnnotationThis section applies although a criminal action has not been commenced; the property owner has the burden of moving for the return of the property. Supreme Video, Inc. v. Schauz, 808 F. Supp. 1380 (1992).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 47 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1971–2026 · leading case: Jones v. State, 594 N.W.2d 738 (Wis. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jones v. State, 594 N.W.2d 738 (Wis. 1999). · cites it 184× “In all other situations where the state has not initiated a forfeiture action, we conclude that a person claiming the right to property seized by the authorities is limited to the procedures set forth in Wis. Stat. § 968.20 . *570 (2) If the interested party brings an action for…”

State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79 (Wis. 2001). · cites it 152× “The circuit court and the court of appeals held that the phrase "the use of the dangerous weapon" requires more than possession of a dangerous weapon in committing a crime before Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (1m)(b) bars return of the weapon.”

City of Milwaukee v. Glass, 2001 WI 61 (Wis. 2001). · cites it 62× “The plaintiffs petition for the return of property seized from him was filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (1997-98). 2 The City of Milwaukee appealed the order, contending that § 968.”

State v. Williams, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 44× “A note to the section by the judicial council criminal rules committee states: This section is a new provision which establishes a simplified procedure for obtaining the return of property seized with or without a warrant. Obviously if such property is needed for use as…”

State v. Leonard, 2015 WI App 57 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 39× “In the alternative, the court concluded the crime for which Leonard was convicted involved the use of the guns and ammunition, and Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (1m)(b) 1 therefore barred their return.”

State v. Bergquist, 2002 WI App 39 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 33× “The State argues that pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (lm)(b), the guns cannot be returned to Bergquist because he committed a crime involving their use.”

In Re Return of Prop. in State v. Benhoff, 518 N.W.2d 307 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 19× “He claims that under § 968.20, STATS., he is entitled to the photographs.”

State v. Gant, 2015 WI App 83 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 10× “*516 Gant never took any formal legal steps available under Wis. Stat. § 968.20 to request the release of his property.”

City of Milwaukee v. Glass, 2000 WI App 252 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 25× “§ 968.20, [1] that the property seized at the time of his arrest had been mistakenly returned to a third party.”

State v. DeSmidt, 454 N.W.2d 780 (Wis. 1990). · cites it 4× “See sec. 968.20, Stats. (1983-84). On August 1, 1986, the circuit court for Brown county, the Honorable William J.”

State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 4× “§ 971.19 (12), we interpret the phrase "subject of the investigation" broadly to encompass more than just Government Accountability Board investigations.”

State v. Tomas Jaymitchell Hoyle, 2023 WI 24 (Wis. 2023). · cites it 2× “¶87 Finally, the dissent fails to offer a competing vision for how to read the law accurately. Rather, the dissent lists a series of legal tools judges can consider: text, history, precedent, context, historical practice and tradition, and the "need to balance 'the majority's…”

Show all 47 citing cases →

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1) — 22 cases

Jones v. State, 594 N.W.2d 738 (Wis. 1999). “In all other situations where the state has not initiated a forfeiture action, we conclude that a person claiming the right to property seized by the authorities is limited to the procedures set forth in Wis. Stat. § 968.20 . *570 (2) If the interested party brings an action for…”

In Re Return of Prop. in State v. Benhoff, 518 N.W.2d 307 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “He claims that under § 968.20, STATS., he is entitled to the photographs.”

State v. Williams, 436 N.W.2d 924 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “A note to the section by the judicial council criminal rules committee states: This section is a new provision which establishes a simplified procedure for obtaining the return of property seized with or without a warrant. Obviously if such property is needed for use as…”

State v. Gant, 2015 WI App 83 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). “*516 Gant never took any formal legal steps available under Wis. Stat. § 968.20 to request the release of his property.”

Return of Prop. in State v. Pippin, 500 N.W.2d 407 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1)(a) — 1 case

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1)(b) — 1 case

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1g) — 4 cases

Vill. of Greendale v. Matthew R. Derzay (Wis. Ct. App. 2021).

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

LSGT Servs. LLC v. Cnty. of Wood (Wis. Ct. App. 2025).

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1g)(a) — 1 case

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1g)(am) — 1 case

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1h) — 1 case

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1m) — 5 cases

State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79 (Wis. 2001). “The circuit court and the court of appeals held that the phrase "the use of the dangerous weapon" requires more than possession of a dangerous weapon in committing a crime before Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (1m)(b) bars return of the weapon.”

In Re Return of Prop. in State v. Benhoff, 518 N.W.2d 307 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “He claims that under § 968.20, STATS., he is entitled to the photographs.”

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1m)(a) — 2 cases

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1m)(b) — 6 cases

State v. Leonard, 2015 WI App 57 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). “In the alternative, the court concluded the crime for which Leonard was convicted involved the use of the guns and ammunition, and Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (1m)(b) 1 therefore barred their return.”

State v. Perez, 2000 WI App 115 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000).

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1m)(d) — 2 cases

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

State v. Joseph A. Wheat (Wis. Ct. App. 2026).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(2) — 2 cases

State v. Andre L. Jones (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(3) — 2 cases

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(3)(b) — 1 case

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(4) — 2 cases

State v. John Dean Pleuss (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(lm) — 2 cases

In Re Return of Prop. in State v. Benhoff, 518 N.W.2d 307 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “He claims that under § 968.20, STATS., he is entitled to the photographs.”

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(lm)(a) — 1 case

— Wis. Stat. § 968.20(lm)(b) — 6 cases

State v. Bergquist, 2002 WI App 39 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “The State argues that pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.20 (lm)(b), the guns cannot be returned to Bergquist because he committed a crime involving their use.”

State v. Perez, 2000 WI App 115 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.