Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 969.09 (2026)
Conditions of bond
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
969.09(1)(1) If a defendant is admitted to bail before sentencing the conditions of the bond shall include, without limitation, the requirements that the defendant will appear in the court having jurisdiction on a day certain and thereafter as ordered until discharged on final order of the court and that the defendant will submit to the orders and process of the court.
969.09(2)(2) If the defendant is admitted to bail upon appeal, the conditions of the bond shall be that the defendant will duly prosecute the defendant’s appeal, that the defendant will appear at such time and place as the court directs, and that if the judgment is affirmed or reversed and remanded for a new trial or further proceedings upon notice after remittitur, the defendant will surrender to the sheriff of the county in which the defendant was tried.
969.09(3)(3) A defendant shall receive a copy of the bond which the defendant executes pursuant to this chapter.
969.09 AnnotationA petition for a writ of habeas corpus properly named the state department with custody of probationers, rather than the sheriff, as the respondent when the petitioner was released on bail pending appeal. Dreske v. DHSS, 483 F. Supp. 783 (1980).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2023 · leading case: State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981).
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “[5-7] Sec. 969.09(1), Stats., mandates that a bail bond be available as a means of releasing the defendant only until *88 the defendant has been discharged by sentencing, i.”
State v. Anderson, 580 N.W.2d 329 (Wis. 1998). “03 (2) providing that the defendant shall not commit any crimes or engage in any criminal activity; Wis. Stat. § 969.09 (1) providing that the defendant shall appear in court as ordered; and Wis.”
Dreske v. Wisconsin Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 483 F. Supp. 783 (E.D. Wis. 1980). “After the judgment of conviction was entered, the petitioner was released on bail by the Milwaukee County Circuit Court pending disposition of his appeal, and after the judgment was affirmed in part, that court continued his bail. Thus, at the time this petition was filed,…”
State Ex Rel. Wohlfahrt v. Bodette, 289 N.W.2d 366 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “6 Section 969.09(1), Stats. 7 Id. 8 Section 969.”
Bartus v. Wisconsin Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 501 N.W.2d 419 (Wis. 1993). “01(2)(b) and § 969.09(2). We reject this contention on the ground that Bartus posted an equivalent $5,000 cash bond as required as a condition of his release pending appeal.”
State v. Hess, 2009 WI App 105 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 969.09(1) states, in pertinent part: "If a defendant is admitted to bail before sentencing^] the conditions of the bond shall include, without limitation .”
State v. Braun, 285 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “1977), upholding conviction for bail-jumping where a case was transferred from Pennsylvania to Florida and defendant claimed *742 Florida courts did not succeed to subject matter jurisdiction, the court holding: “But even if [this court] had not had subject matter jurisdiction…”
State v. Kit R. Stilwell (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “Although Stilwell asserts that a trial for his case “was never scheduled nor ordered by the court” and thus that his trial violated this statute, the record shows that Stilwell was present in court on July 21, 2022—when he was in custody, not released on bond—and given notice…”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.09(1) — 5 cases
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “[5-7] Sec. 969.09(1), Stats., mandates that a bail bond be available as a means of releasing the defendant only until *88 the defendant has been discharged by sentencing, i.”
State Ex Rel. Wohlfahrt v. Bodette, 289 N.W.2d 366 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “6 Section 969.09(1), Stats. 7 Id. 8 Section 969.”
State v. Hess, 2009 WI App 105 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 969.09(1) states, in pertinent part: "If a defendant is admitted to bail before sentencing^] the conditions of the bond shall include, without limitation .”
State v. Braun, 285 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “1977), upholding conviction for bail-jumping where a case was transferred from Pennsylvania to Florida and defendant claimed *742 Florida courts did not succeed to subject matter jurisdiction, the court holding: “But even if [this court] had not had subject matter jurisdiction…”
State v. Kit R. Stilwell (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “Although Stilwell asserts that a trial for his case “was never scheduled nor ordered by the court” and thus that his trial violated this statute, the record shows that Stilwell was present in court on July 21, 2022—when he was in custody, not released on bond—and given notice…”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.09(2) — 3 cases
Dreske v. Wisconsin Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 483 F. Supp. 783 (E.D. Wis. 1980). “After the judgment of conviction was entered, the petitioner was released on bail by the Milwaukee County Circuit Court pending disposition of his appeal, and after the judgment was affirmed in part, that court continued his bail. Thus, at the time this petition was filed,…”
Bartus v. Wisconsin Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 501 N.W.2d 419 (Wis. 1993). “01(2)(b) and § 969.09(2). We reject this contention on the ground that Bartus posted an equivalent $5,000 cash bond as required as a condition of his release pending appeal.”
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “[5-7] Sec. 969.09(1), Stats., mandates that a bail bond be available as a means of releasing the defendant only until *88 the defendant has been discharged by sentencing, i.”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.09(6) — 1 case
State v. Braun, 285 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “1977), upholding conviction for bail-jumping where a case was transferred from Pennsylvania to Florida and defendant claimed *742 Florida courts did not succeed to subject matter jurisdiction, the court holding: “But even if [this court] had not had subject matter jurisdiction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.