Notes of Decisions
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36 (Wis. 2004).
· cites it 42× “" At oral argument, they further asserted that Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (6)(h) provides a statutory basis for the right to counsel throughout the revocation proceedings, including certiorari review in the circuit court.”
State Ex Rel. Schmelzer v. Murphy, 548 N.W.2d 45 (Wis. 1996).
· cites it 8× “32(4) is not in violation of the state and federal constitution; second, that the public defender nonetheless has a statutory duty under Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (4)(j) (1977) 3 to provide counsel in other cases, that is, in cases where a no merit report is not *253 filed, through…”
State Ex Rel. Chiarkas v. Skow, 465 N.W.2d 625 (Wis. 1991).
· cites it 8× “Section 977.05(4) (g), Stats. Third, the Public Defender has a legally protectible interest in the controversy.”
State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 579 N.W.2d 698 (Wis. 1998).
· cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (4)(j). The circuit court also declined, in its discretion pursuant to State v.”
Polk Cnty. v. State Pub. Def., 507 N.W.2d 576 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 7× “The county argues that sec. 977.05, Stats., requires experts be paid by the state public defender (SPD), and that the trial court erred as a matter of law by ordering it to pay for Brenizer's experts.”
State v. Jackson, 600 N.W.2d 39 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “See § 977.05(6)(c), STATS. (specifying the circumstances under which "[t]he state public defender may not provide legal services or assign counsel for an adult in a criminal case"); see also WIS.”
Payment of Witness Fees in State v. Huisman, 482 N.W.2d 665 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 4× “The SPD contends that the limited size of the private bar appropriation in the state budget is an indication of the legislative *175 intent to impose partial responsibility upon the counties for payment.”
Douglas Cnty. v. Edwards, 403 N.W.2d 438 (Wis. 1987).
“977, and specifically sec. 977.05(5)(a), Stats. 8 He was not appointed under the regular procedures set out in ch.”
State v. Krysheski, 349 N.W.2d 729 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 2× “1 Section 977.05(4) (j), Stats., provides: The state public defender shall: (j) At the request of any person determined by the state public defender to be indigent or upon referral of any court, prosecute a writ of error, appeal, action or proceeding for habeas corpus or other…”
Brotzman v. Brotzman, 283 N.W.2d 600 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979).
· cites it 2× “We note that under §977.05(4) (h), Stats. (1977), the state public defender may "[a]ccept requests for legal services from indigent persons entitled to counsel under s.”
Off. of the State Pub. Def. v. Circuit Court for Dodge Cnty., 312 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 1981).
· cites it 2× “The Dodge county circuit court ruled that sec. 977.05(4), Stats. 1979-80, requires the Office of the State Public Defender to represent eligible prisoners in conditions-of-confinement cases and ordered the Office to represent Parker.”
State v. Nhia Lee, 2021 WI App 12 (Wis. Ct. App. 2021).
“§ 977.05(1). The state public defender, in turn, compiles a list of attorneys in each county willing to represent SPD-eligible clients, see WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(1) — 1 case
State v. Nhia Lee, 2021 WI App 12 (Wis. Ct. App. 2021).
“§ 977.05(1). The state public defender, in turn, compiles a list of attorneys in each county willing to represent SPD-eligible clients, see WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4) — 5 cases
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36 (Wis. 2004).
“" At oral argument, they further asserted that Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (6)(h) provides a statutory basis for the right to counsel throughout the revocation proceedings, including certiorari review in the circuit court.”
State v. Krysheski, 349 N.W.2d 729 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984).
“1 Section 977.05(4) (j), Stats., provides: The state public defender shall: (j) At the request of any person determined by the state public defender to be indigent or upon referral of any court, prosecute a writ of error, appeal, action or proceeding for habeas corpus or other…”
Brotzman v. Brotzman, 283 N.W.2d 600 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979).
“We note that under §977.05(4) (h), Stats. (1977), the state public defender may "[a]ccept requests for legal services from indigent persons entitled to counsel under s.”
State Ex Rel. Chiarkas v. Skow, 465 N.W.2d 625 (Wis. 1991).
“Section 977.05(4) (g), Stats. Third, the Public Defender has a legally protectible interest in the controversy.”
Off. of the State Pub. Def. v. Circuit Court for Dodge Cnty., 312 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 1981).
“The Dodge county circuit court ruled that sec. 977.05(4), Stats. 1979-80, requires the Office of the State Public Defender to represent eligible prisoners in conditions-of-confinement cases and ordered the Office to represent Parker.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4)(g) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Chiarkas v. Skow, 465 N.W.2d 625 (Wis. 1991).
“Section 977.05(4) (g), Stats. Third, the Public Defender has a legally protectible interest in the controversy.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4)(h) — 2 cases
Payment of Witness Fees in State v. Huisman, 482 N.W.2d 665 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
“The SPD contends that the limited size of the private bar appropriation in the state budget is an indication of the legislative *175 intent to impose partial responsibility upon the counties for payment.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4)(i) — 4 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4)(j) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Schmelzer v. Murphy, 548 N.W.2d 45 (Wis. 1996).
“32(4) is not in violation of the state and federal constitution; second, that the public defender nonetheless has a statutory duty under Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (4)(j) (1977) 3 to provide counsel in other cases, that is, in cases where a no merit report is not *253 filed, through…”
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36 (Wis. 2004).
“" At oral argument, they further asserted that Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (6)(h) provides a statutory basis for the right to counsel throughout the revocation proceedings, including certiorari review in the circuit court.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4)(k) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(4r) — 1 case
Polk Cnty. v. State Pub. Def., 507 N.W.2d 576 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
“The county argues that sec. 977.05, Stats., requires experts be paid by the state public defender (SPD), and that the trial court erred as a matter of law by ordering it to pay for Brenizer's experts.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(5)(a) — 1 case
Douglas Cnty. v. Edwards, 403 N.W.2d 438 (Wis. 1987).
“977, and specifically sec. 977.05(5)(a), Stats. 8 He was not appointed under the regular procedures set out in ch.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(6)(c) — 1 case
State v. Jackson, 600 N.W.2d 39 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
“See § 977.05(6)(c), STATS. (specifying the circumstances under which "[t]he state public defender may not provide legal services or assign counsel for an adult in a criminal case"); see also WIS.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(6)(h) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36 (Wis. 2004).
“" At oral argument, they further asserted that Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (6)(h) provides a statutory basis for the right to counsel throughout the revocation proceedings, including certiorari review in the circuit court.”
— Wis. Stat. § 977.05(i) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36 (Wis. 2004).
“" At oral argument, they further asserted that Wis. Stat. § 977.05 (6)(h) provides a statutory basis for the right to counsel throughout the revocation proceedings, including certiorari review in the circuit court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
