Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 1-12-102 (2026)
When party incapable of testifying.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In an action or suit by or against a person who from any cause is incapable of testifying, or by or against a trustee, executor, administrator, heir or other representative of the person incapable of testifying, no judgment or decree founded on uncorroborated testimony shall be rendered in favor of a party whose interests are adverse to the person incapable of testifying or his trustee, executor, administrator, heir or other representative. In any such action or suit, if the adverse party testifies, all entries, memorandum and declarations by the party incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the matter in issue, may be received in evidence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1981–2014 · leading case: Consol. Constr., Inc. v. Smith, 634 P.2d 902 (Wyo. 1981).
Consol. Constr., Inc. v. Smith, 634 P.2d 902 (Wyo. 1981). “As a result of the adverse decision below, the *903 appellant now raises one basic issue for our consideration: Did the trial court err as a matter of law by applying § 1-12-102, W.S. 1977, [1] to the facts of this case? For the reasons discussed below we deem the trial court…”
Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc., 2002 WY 21 (Wyo. 2002). “The district court refused to consider such statements as being hearsay, The district court's *1058 ruling necessarily involves the dead man's statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-12-102 (Lexis-Nexis 2001), which provides: In an action or suit by or against a person who from any cause…”
Est. of Short, 785 P.2d 1167 (Wyo. 1990). “Wyo.Stat. § 1-12-102 (1977) In its decision letter, the district court stated that, pursuant to Wyo.”
Drake v. Winkler, 838 P.2d 1177 (Wyo. 1992). “Appellees contend that no written documentation exists evidencing Stagner's promise to repay money to Drake and that Wyo.Stat. § 1-12-102 (1988), requires a claim made against a party incapable of testifying to be corroborated.”
Yost v. Harpel Oil Co., 674 P.2d 712 (Wyo. 1983). “If corroboration is required to meet the requirements of the "dead man's statute," § 1-12-102, W.S. 1977 [1] , the unusual extension of credit over the long period of time and the July 28, 1964, written agreement provides the necessary corroboration.”
Adkins v. Lawson, 892 P.2d 128 (Wyo. 1995). “The estate argued in part that, under the dead man’s statute, Wyo.Stat. § 1-12-102 (1988), the uncorroborated statements which Adkins attributed to Washut could not be used as a basis to deny its motion.”
Est. of Dahlke ex rel. Jubie v. Dahlke, 319 P.3d 116 (Wyo. 2014). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-12-102 (LexisNexis 2013) provides as follows: In an action or suit by or against a person who from any cause is incapable of testifying, or by or against a trustee, executor, administrator, heir or other representative of the person incapable of testifying,…”
Clark v. Gale, 966 P.2d 431 (Wyo. 1998). “Loren argues that the dead man statute (Wyo. Stat. § 1-12-102 (1997)) precluded a judgment from being entered against Leona's estate solely on the basis of uncorroborated testimony from Bob and Suzanne because they were adverse parties.”
Freudenthal v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc., 2010 WY 80 (Wyo. 2010). “1-12-104; (iv) A person who assigns his claim or interest concerning any matter in respect to which he would not be permitted to testify if a party; (v) A person who, if a party, would be restricted in his evidence under W.S. 1-12-102 shall, where the property is sold or…”
Moncrief v. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co., 880 F. Supp. 1495 (D. Wyo. 1995). “Each of these contracts has "Seller and partners” language identical to the Moncrief contract. 14 . The Court notes that without independent evidence to support his claim against his father's estate, Wyoming’s dead man’s statute prohibits him from testifying about his interest.”
Aland v. Mead, 327 P.3d 752 (Wyo. 2014). “1-12-104; (iv) A person who assigns his claim or interest concerning any matter in respect to which he would not be permitted to testify if a party; (v) A person who, if a party, would be restricted in his evidence under W.S. 1-12-102 shall, where the property is sold or…”
McClellan v. Britain, 826 P.2d 245 (Wyo. 1992). “Wyoming’s version of the "dead man’s statute” is Wyo.Stat. § 1-12-102 (1988) which provides in part: In an action or suit by or against a person who from any cause is incapable of testifying, or by or against a trustee, executor, administrator, heir or other representative of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.