Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-13-101 (2026)

Constitutional questions; generally.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When an important and difficult constitutional question arises
in a proceeding pending before the district court on motion of
either party or upon his own motion the judge of the district
court may cause the question to be reserved and sent to the
supreme court for its decision.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1981–2004 · leading case: RM v. Washakie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One, 2004 WY 162 (Wyo. 2004).
RM v. Washakie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One, 2004 WY 162 (Wyo. 2004). · cites it 13× “[¶1] This case comes to this court as a reserved constitutional question pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-13-101 (LexisNexis 2003).”
Galesburg Constr. Co. of Wyoming v. Bd. of Trs. of Mem'l Hosp. of Converse Cnty., 641 P.2d 745 (Wyo. 1982). · cites it 6× “I, § 3, of the Wyoming Constitution [3] and § 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
Allhusen v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Mental Health Professions Licensing Bd., 898 P.2d 878 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 4× “11 5 rather than Wyo.Stat. § 1-13-101 (1988). 6 We understand Wyo.”
State Ex Rel. Wyoming Farm Loan Bd. v. Herschler, 622 P.2d 1378 (Wyo. 1981). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the provisions of § 1-13-101, W.S.1977 1 , the District Court, First Judicial District, County of Laramie, on its own motion, reserved the following questions to this court as important and difficult constitutional questions: “1.”
Cnty. Court Judges Ass'n v. Sidi, 752 P.2d 960 (Wyo. 1988). · cites it 2× “" Pursuant to § 1-13-101, W.S. 1977, and Rule 52(c), W.”
Powell v. O.R. \Bud\" Daily", 712 P.2d 356 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 2× “The district court certified the constitutional question involved to this court, after stipulation of the parties, pursuant to §§ 1-13-101 through 1-13-107, W.S. 1977, and Rule 52(c), W.”
Rodabaugh v. Ross, 807 P.2d 380 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 4× “The question sought to be raised in this case by virtue of the certification of a constitutional question pursuant to § 1-13-101, W.S.1977 (June 1988 Repl.), 1 and Rule 52(c), W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.