Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 01 - Civil Procedure / Chapter 13 - RESERVATION OF QUESTION TO SUPREME COURT / Article 6 - BURDEN OF PROOF
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-13-104 (2026)

Questions from federal courts; generally.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
W.S. 1-13-104 through 1-13-107 is cited as the "Federal Court
State Law Certificate Procedure Act".
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Schneider Nat'l, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co., 843 P.2d 561 (Wyo. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schneider Nat'l, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co., 843 P.2d 561 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 4× “[3] See Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-13-104 through 1-13-107 (1988).”
Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Repub. Ins. Co., 929 P.2d 535 (Wyo. 1996). · cites it 4× “The questions that were certified to this court, pursuant to Wyo. Stat. § 1-13-104 through 107 (1988) 1 are: 1.”
Jackson State Bank v. King, 844 P.2d 1093 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 4× “11 and Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-13-104 to -107 (1988), the Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act.”
McCullough v. Golden Rule Ins. Co., 789 P.2d 855 (Wyo. 1990). · cites it 2× “1964), certified the legal issue pursuant to W.S. 1-13-104 through 1-13-107 for our finite resolution since clear precedent in state law did not exist on implementation of first-person independent tort complaint.”
Briefing. Com v. Jones, 2006 WY 16 (Wyo. 2006). · cites it 4× “It is my conviction that the Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition so closely resembles a system of statutes, akin to UTSA, that the adoption of it as the governing law in Wyoming is a usurpation of the Legislature's authority and responsibility.”
Shoshone First Bank v. Pac. Employers Ins. Co., 2 P.3d 510 (Wyo. 2000). · cites it 2× “The certified question presented by the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-13-104 through 1-18-107 (Lexis 1999) and W.”
B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc., 829 P.2d 809 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “See Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-13-104 to -107 (1988). Because this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to the rule and statute is limited, we do not consider the extra-record argument of counsel involving post-deliberation jury interviews and certain trial exhibits that are not included in the…”
Phillips v. Duro-Last Roofing, Inc., 806 P.2d 834 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 2× “First, pursuant to W.S. 1-13-104 through 1-13-107, the Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act, nothing is indicated that this court is authorized to answer more than is asked.”
Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 682 P.2d 975 (Wyo. 1984). “The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, pursuant to the Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act, §§ 1-13-104 through 1-13-107, W.S. 1977, and Rules 11.”
Harvey v. Gen. Motors Corp., 739 P.2d 763 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 2× “The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, pursuant to the Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act, §§ 1-13-104 through 1-13-107, W.S. 1977, and Rules 11.”
Sterner v. United States, 774 P.2d 639 (Wyo. 1989). · cites it 3× “The license transferee appealed to the United States Court of Appeals which then certified to this court questions of law pursuant to Sections 1-13-104 to -107, W.S.1977, the Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act 1 , and Rules 11.”
Mauler v. Titus, 697 P.2d 303 (Wyo. 1985). “The Federal Court State Law Certificate Procedure Act, §§ 1-13-104 through 1-13-107, W.S. 1977, as implemented by Rules 11.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.