Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 1-14-124 (2026)
Costs allowed for recovery of money or property.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Costs shall be allowed to the plaintiff upon a judgment in his favor in an action for the recovery of money only or for the recovery of specific real or personal property, unless otherwise provided by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1985–2019 · leading case: Morris v. CMS Oil & Gas Co., 2010 WY 37 (Wyo. 2010).
Morris v. CMS Oil & Gas Co., 2010 WY 37 (Wyo. 2010). “[¶ 40] This Court upheld the district court's division of costs between the parties on the basis of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-14-124 (1988) and W.R.”
Garrison v. CC Builders, Inc., 2008 WY 34 (Wyo. 2008). “Did the district court abuse its discretion in its award of costs to the Garrisons? [¶ 42] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-14-124 (LexisNexis 2007) provides that costs “shall be allowed to a plaintiff upon a judgment in his favor in an action for the recovery of money.”
State v. Dieringer, 708 P.2d 1 (Wyo. 1985). “Finally the appellants complain of the award of costs for a transcript of Kinniburgh's *11 testimony at trial in the amount of $260.”
Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 767 P.2d 158 (Wyo. 1989). “" [13] W.S. 1-14-124 provides: Costs shall be allowed to the plaintiff upon a judgment in his favor in an action for the recovery of money only or for the recovery of specific real or personal property, unless otherwise provided by law.”
Crawford v. Amadio, 932 P.2d 1288 (Wyo. 1997). “Wyo. Stat. § 1-14-124 (1988) (emphasis added).”
Guy v. Wyo. Dep't of Corr., 444 P.3d 652 (Wyo. 2019). “1998) (interpreting "prevailing party" in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-14-124 ); Morris , 2010 WY 37 , ¶¶ 35-46, 227 P.”
Schaub v. Wilson, 969 P.2d 552 (Wyo. 1998). “The general rule is set forth in Wyo. Stat. § 1-14-124 (1997): “Costs shall be allowed to the plaintiff upon a judgment in his favor in an action for the recovery of money only or for the recovery of specific real or personal property, unless otherwise provided by law.”
Seaton v. State, 811 P.2d 276 (Wyo. 1991). “* * * The civil costs statute, § 1-14-124, W.S. 1977, affords no itemization detail, nor does any procedural rule.”
O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Prods. Fin. Servs., Inc., 761 P.2d 673 (Wyo. 1988). “Bi-Rite Package, Inc. v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District of Fremont County, 735 P.”
Kaess v. State, 748 P.2d 698 (Wyo. 1987). “The civil costs statute, § 1-14-124, W.S.1977, affords no itemization detail, nor does any procedural rule.”
Goodman v. Voss, 2011 WY 33 (Wyo. 2011). “The Vosses argue that they obtained what they wanted from the proceedings, that they paid less than they offered in settlement, and that they were the "prevailing party" as that term is used in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-14-124 (LexisNexis 2009) (costs allowed to successful plaintiffs…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.