Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-17-201 (2026)

Right to stay; procedure.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) When judgment has been rendered in any district court
against any person for the recovery of money or sale of property
he may have a stay of execution as provided by the Wyoming Rules
of Civil Procedure, except that a supersedeas bond to be
furnished in order to stay the execution of any judgment under
this section or under W.S. 1-17-210 during the entire course of
appellate review shall not, regardless of amount of the
judgment, exceed two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) in any
action in which all appellants are either individuals or have
fifty (50) or fewer employees, or twenty-five million dollars
($25,000,000.00) in any other action; provided, however:

          (i) That if an appellee proves by a preponderance of
the evidence that an appellant is dissipating assets which may
affect the ultimate payment of all or any portion of the
judgment, the district court, upon motion and hearing, may
require the appellant to post a bond in an amount up to the
amount of the judgment; or

          (ii) That an appellee of a judgment to pay taxes or
liens to the state of Wyoming shall post a bond in an amount not
less than the full amount of the judgment plus interest and
costs of the appeal, unless otherwise ordered, as provided in
Rule 4.02(b) of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Bdo Seidman v. Banco Espirito Santo Int'l, Ltd., 998 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Bdo Seidman v. Banco Espirito Santo Int'l, Ltd., 998 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). “07 (2003) ($100 million cap); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-17-201 (2007) ($25 million).”
the Huff Energy Fund, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R.\Bill\" Huff (2015). · cites it 2× “Code § 58-5-14 14 Wyo. Stat. § 1-17-201 13 I H.B. 4, 78th Leg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.