Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-36-101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
W.S. 1-36-101 through 1-36-119 may be cited as the Uniform
Arbitration Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1981–2023 · leading case: Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Tilden, 2003 WY 31 (Wyo. 2003).
Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Tilden, 2003 WY 31 (Wyo. 2003). · cites it 2× “DISCUSSION [¶ 5] Wyoming’s Uniform Arbitration Act (Act), Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-36-101 through 1-36-119, provides for confirmation of an arbitration award by a district court having jurisdiction under Wyo.”
Rick Miller, Appointed Wrongful Death Rep. for the Est. of Julia Faye Miller v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., a Foreign Corp. & Casper Operations, Llc, a Foreign Llc, D/B/A Life Care Ctr. of Casper, 2020 WY 155 (Wyo. 2020). · cites it 2× “§§ 1 through 16, and the Wyoming Uniform Arbitration Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-36-101 through 119 (LexisNexis 2019), the rights and obligations to arbitrate are created by contract.”
Weston Cnty. Hosp. Jt. Powers Bd. v. Westates Constr. Co., 841 P.2d 841 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 4× “See Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-36-101 to -119 (1988). For that reason, it was essential that Westates seek confirmation of the award from the district court as it did.”
State, Wyoming Game & Fish Comm'n v. Thornock, 851 P.2d 1300 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 4× “§ 23-1-901(e) cross-references provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act, Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-36-101 to -119 (1988). Through case law analysis, the Commission relies indirectly upon Wyo.”
Robert L. Gill v. Elizabeth Lockhart, 2022 WY 87 (Wyo. 2022). · cites it 2× “DISCUSSION [¶30] Wyoming’s Uniform Arbitration Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-36-101 through 1-36- 119 (LexisNexis 2021), provides for the confirmation of an arbitration award by a district court that has jurisdiction over the parties.”
Simon v. Teton Bd. of Realtors, 4 P.3d 197 (Wyo. 2000). · cites it 4× “The resolution of this case requires this Court to rule upon the efficacy of a provision for procedural review, found in the National Association of Realtors Code of Ethics and Arbitration Manual (the manual), and the ninety-day period for filing an application to vacate an…”
Panhandle E. Pipe Line Co. v. Smith, 637 P.2d 1020 (Wyo. 1981). · cites it 2× “If Panhandle wanted the dispute to be arbitrated, it should have used the procedure set out in the Uniform Arbitration Act, § 1-36-101, et seq., W.S. 1977, which says that the district court has the jurisdiction to enforce an agreement providing for arbitration.”
State High. Comm'n v. Brasel & Sims Constr. Co., 688 P.2d 871 (Wyo. 1984). · cites it 2× “This, of course, is contrary to the rules of statutory construction looking toward ascertainment of the intent of the parties; and it disregards the finality of an arbitration award, except for specified purposes, as recognized by the legislature in the Uniform Arbitration Act,…”
Michel Skaf, M.D. v. Wyoming Cardiopulmonary Servs., P.C., a Wyoming Corp., 2021 WY 105 (Wyo. 2021). “We “apply state law principles governing contract formation in deciding whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable.” Miller, ¶ 14, 478 P.”
Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. v. Boyd, 403 P.3d 1014 (Wyo. 2017). “- §§ 1-36-101 through 1-36-119. The parties agree that the speed, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of the ADR process, together with their mutual undertaking to engage in that process, constitute good.”
In the Matter of the Claim for Damages Filed By Josh Longwell With the Wyoming Game & Fish Dep't: Josh Longwell v. Wyoming Game & Fish Dep't, 2022 WY 56 (Wyo. 2022). “See Uniform Arbitration Act, §§ 1-36-101 to 1-36-119. In general, “‘we are reluctant to disturb an arbitrator’s just solution to a controversy, even if it differs from the resolution we might have chosen, had we been in the arbitrator’s place.”
Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc., 433 So. 2d 1158 (Ala. 1983). “§§ 21-25A-1 et seq. (1979); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-101, et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.