Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-36-103 (2026)

Written agreement to submit controversy to

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
arbitration valid.

A written agreement to submit any existing or future controversy
to arbitration is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon
such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of
the contract. This includes arbitration agreements between
employers and employees or between their respective
representatives unless otherwise provided in the agreement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2023 · leading case: Hot Springs Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Strube Constr. Co., 715 P.2d 540 (Wyo. 1986).
Hot Springs Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Strube Constr. Co., 715 P.2d 540 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 12× “Section 1-36-103, W.S. 1977 (part of the Uniform Arbitration Act), provides in pertinent part: "A written agreement to submit any existing or future controversy to arbitration is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the…”
Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. v. Boyd, 403 P.3d 1014 (Wyo. 2017). · cites it 2× “6 STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶12] Both the Federal Arbitration Act and the Uniform Arbitration Act adopted by the Wyoming legislature make arbitration agreements “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
Scherer v. Scherer, 931 P.2d 251 (Wyo. 1997). “Secondly, W.S. 1-36-103 defines arbitration as a contractual right.”
Georgia Noel Inman v. Matthew G. Grimmer, Individually Jacob R. Davis, Individually Grimmer & Assocs., P.C., a Utah Prof'l Corp. & Grimmer, Davis, Revelli & Ballif, a Utah Prof'l Corp., 2021 WY 55 (Wyo. 2021). · cites it 4× “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-36-103 (“A written agreement to submit any existing or future controversy to arbitration is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of the contract.”
T & M Props. v. ZVFK Architects & Planners, 661 P.2d 1040 (Wyo. 1983). “The appropriate statute for this proposition is § 1-36-103, W.S.1977: “A written agreement to submit any existing or future controversy to arbitration is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.