Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-110 (2026)

Supplemental relief.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Further relief based on a declaratory judgment may be granted.
Application therefor shall be by petition to a court having
jurisdiction to grant the relief. If the application is
sufficient the court, on reasonable notice, shall require any
adverse party whose rights have been adjudicated by the
declaratory judgment to show cause why further relief should not
be granted.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming Corp., 2015 WY 40 (Wyo. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming Corp., 2015 WY 40 (Wyo. 2015). · cites it 7× “Section 1-87-110 states: § 1-37-110. Supplemental relief Further relief based on a declaratory judgment may be granted.”

Robert L. Gill v. Elizabeth Lockhart, 2022 WY 87 (Wyo. 2022). · cites it 2× “Therefore, we hold, absent some statutory authority to the contrary,12 the party seeking to enforce a vague or indefinite judgment has the burden of 12 In Ultra Resources, we acknowledged the statutory procedure in the Declaratory Judgment Act provides the trial court, when…”

In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River, 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988). “In addition, § 1-37-110, W.S. 1977, provides supplemental relief: "Further relief based on a declaratory judgment may be granted.”

Simons v. Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One, 741 P.2d 1116 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 2× “That remedial financial obligation or recovery can generally be determined and enforced in either the administrative appeal or declaratory judgment proceedings, is not really an issue of present justiciable dispute.”

In Re Big Horn River Sys., 803 P.2d 61 (Wyo. 1990). “Whether the District Court erred in denying further relief pursuant to § 1-37-110, W.S. 1977?" The Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes, appellees, which we shall treat as respondents to the petition for writ of certiorari, say that the issues really are: "I.”

Mountain West Mines, Inc. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co., 376 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (D. Wyo. 2005). · cites it 2× “§§ 2201 and 2202 and Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-110 that neither Cliffs nor any other Defendants or other transferees of any other property from Cliffs other than the Original Four properties (Four Mile, North Bing, North Butte, and Greasewood Creek) owe any royalty to Mountain West.”

Alexander v. United States, 803 P.2d 61 (Wyo. 1990). “Whether the District Court erred in denying further relief pursuant to § 1-37-110, W.S.1977?” The Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes, appellees, which we shall treat as respondents to the petition for writ of cer-tiorari, say that the issues really are: “I.”

State v. Owl Creek Irrigation Dist. Members, 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988). “In addition, § 1-37-110, W.S. 1977, provides supplemental relief: “Further relief based on a declaratory judgment may be granted.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.