Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 11 - Agriculture, Livestock and Other Animals / Chapter 5 - WEED AND PEST CONTROL / Article 1 - IN GENERAL
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 11-5-111 (2026)

Tax levied on property in district; maximum

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
amount; weed and pest control fund.

The county commissioners shall annually levy a tax to carry out
this act. The tax shall be levied upon all property in the
district and shall not exceed one (1) mill on each one dollar
($1.00) of assessed valuation. The tax is not part of the
general county or city mill levies. All taxes levied and
collected shall be remitted to the district for a separate fund
to be known as the weed and pest control fund, which shall be
used only to carry out this act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1992 · leading case: Cranston v. Weston Cnty. Weed & Pest Bd., 826 P.2d 251 (Wyo. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cranston v. Weston Cnty. Weed & Pest Bd., 826 P.2d 251 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “" W.S. 11-5-111. Any funds appropriated by the legislature for weed and pest control are allocated by an allocation committee which consists of the Commissioner of Agriculture, three members appointed by the state weed and pest council, and one member of the Wyoming Board of…”
State ex rel. Albany Cnty. Weed & Pest Dist. v. Bd. of the Cnty. Commissioners, 592 P.2d 1154 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 3× “The only contention made and the only issue before this court is whether § 11-5-111, W.S.1977, 1978 Repl., imposes on the board the ministerial act of levying such amount of tax as the district seeks, within the statutory one-mill limit, or whether the board has discretion…”
State Ex Rel. Albany, Etc. v. Bd. of Cty., 592 P.2d 1154 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 6× “The only contention made and the only issue before this court is whether § 11-5-111, W.S. 1977, 1978 Repl., imposes on the board the ministerial act of levying such amount of tax as the district seeks, within the statutory one-mill limit, or whether the board has discretion…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.