Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 16-3-106 (2026)

Petition for promulgation, amendment or repeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
of rules.

Any interested person may petition an agency requesting the
promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rule and may accompany
his petition with relevant data, views and arguments. Each
agency may prescribe by rule the form of the petition and the
procedure for its submission, consideration and disposition.
Upon submission of a petition, the agency as soon as practicable
either shall deny the petition in writing (stating its reasons
for the denials) or initiate rulemaking proceedings in
accordance with W.S. 16-3-103. The action of the agency in
denying a petition is final and not subject to review.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case: Walker v. Karpan, 726 P.2d 82 (Wyo. 1986).
Walker v. Karpan, 726 P.2d 82 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 4× “That W.S. § 16-3-106 applies to this Petition for Review and therefore the Agency decision is not subject to review; “and thereby incorrectly decide that the Agency decision be affirmed and the Petition for Review be denied? *85 “5.”
William F. West Ranch, LLC v. Tyrrell, 2009 WY 62 (Wyo. 2009). · cites it 2× “[148] Any interested person may petition an ageney for promulgation, amendment or repeal of a rule under § 16-3-106. We recognized the importance of the petition process in Goedert v.”
Chester Loyde Bird v. Robert O. Lampert, in his Off. capacity as Dir. of the Wyoming Dep't of Corr., 2021 WY 11 (Wyo. 2021). “The term includes the amendment or repeal of a prior rule, but does not include: (A) Statements concerning only the internal management of an agency and not affecting private rights or procedures available to the public; or (B) Rulings issued pursuant to W.S. 16-3-106; or (C)…”
Wheeler v. State, 705 P.2d 861 (Wyo. 1985). “The term includes the amendment or repeal of a prior rule, but does not include: “(A) Statements concerning only the internal management of an agency and not affecting private rights or procedures available to the public; or “(B) Rulings issued pursuant to section 6 [§ 16-3-106]…”
Matter of Bessemer Mt., 856 P.2d 450 (Wyo. 1993). “§ 16-3-106 (1990), sets forth the procedural authority for rulemaking: Any interested person may petition an agency requesting the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rule and may accompany his petition with relevant data, views and arguments.”
Goedert ex rel. Wolfe v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 991 P.2d 1225 (Wyo. 1999). · cites it 4× “That statute states: Any interested person may petition an agency requesting the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rule and may accompany his petition with relevant data, views and arguments.”
State v. Stahl, 838 P.2d 1193 (Wyo. 1992). “While these statutes appear to liberalize the common law rules of confined jurisdiction, not one of them goes nearly so far as the state proposes was done through silence by the Wyoming legislature.”
Rissler & McMurry v. Env't Quality Council, 856 P.2d 450 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 2× “The Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act, Wyo.Stat. § 16-3-106 (1990), sets forth the procedural authority for rulemak-ing: Any interested person may petition an agency requesting the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rule and may accompany his petition with relevant…”
Goedert v. State Ex Rel. Workers'Saf. & Comp. Div., 991 P.2d 1225 (Wyo. 1999). · cites it 4× “That statute states: Any interested person may petition an agency requesting the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rule and may accompany his petition with relevant data, views and arguments. Each agency may prescribe by rule the form of the petition and the procedure for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.