Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 20-6-215 (2026)
Minimum and maximum amount of withholding;
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
allocation.
(a) Subject to the limitation under W.S. 20-6-210(b)(iii)
the aggregate amount of income withheld under an income
withholding order served upon one (1) or more payors of an
obligor shall:
(i) Satisfy the current support obligation under the
support order;
(ii) Include an additional amount to be applied
toward the liquidation of any arrearage; and
(iii) Include the amount actually withheld for
support combined with the fee authorized by W.S. 20-6-212(c).
(b) If the department is enforcing separate support
obligations under this act against a single obligor, it shall
allocate amounts withheld giving priority to current support up
to the limits imposed under W.S. 20-6-210(b)(iii) using the
allocation method provided in W.S. 20-6-206(b).Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1993–1993 · leading case: Davidson v. Sherman, 848 P.2d 1341 (Wyo. 1993).
Davidson v. Sherman, 848 P.2d 1341 (Wyo. 1993). “§ 20-6-106(n) and W.S. § 20-6-215(b) require Defendant to account for all child support collected and held in trust as current month’s child support first and only after payment of current child support obligations can Defendant treat the child support collected as against the…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 20-6-215(b) — 1 case
Davidson v. Sherman, 848 P.2d 1341 (Wyo. 1993). “§ 20-6-106(n) and W.S. § 20-6-215(b) require Defendant to account for all child support collected and held in trust as current month’s child support first and only after payment of current child support obligations can Defendant treat the child support collected as against the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.