Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-301 (2026)
Applicability of provisions; reciprocity.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) This act applies to all injuries and deaths occurring in Wyoming in employment described in W.S. 27-14-108(a), (d), (e), (j), (k) or (m) but applies to injuries and deaths occurring in Wyoming to employees of nonresident employers only if the worker's compensation or similar law of the nonresident employer's home state applies to all injuries and deaths occurring in that state or the nonresident employer's home state and Wyoming have an active agreement under W.S. 27-14-306(d). This act applies to all injuries and deaths occurring outside of Wyoming in employment described in W.S. 27-14-108(a), (d), (e), (j), (k) or (m) under the following conditions: (i) Repealed by Laws 2006, Chapter 2, § 2. (ii) The employee at the time of the injury is working under a contract for hire made in Wyoming for employment by an employer who has a principal place of business within the state established for legitimate business-related purposes and the employment is within the United States, a United States territory, Canada or Mexico, but which is not principally localized in any other state, United States territory, Canada or Mexico; or (iii) The employee at the time of the injury is working under a contract for hire made in Wyoming for employment principally localized in another state, United States territory, Canada or Mexico, the workers' compensation law of which jurisdiction does not require that the employment be covered by a workers' compensation insurance policy issued under the laws of that jurisdiction. (b) Repealed By Laws 2006, Chapter 2, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1991–2005 · leading case: Kunkle v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 109 P.3d 887 (Wyo. 2005).
Kunkle v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 109 P.3d 887 (Wyo. 2005). “Kunkle argues that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-301 (LexisNexis 2003), which purports to require that the employment must be principally located in Wyoming for the act to apply to the work-related injury, pertains only to employment outside of Wyoming and therefore, does not apply to…”
Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 271 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2001). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-301 (Michie 2001).”
Stuarte v. Colorado Interstate Gas, Co., 130 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (D. Wyo. 2001). “The maxim of construction ex-pressio unius est exclusio alterius (the mention of one excludes others) carries added weight in this case considering that § 27-14-301 was created after, and supersedes, Wessel .”
Wheeler v. Parker Drilling Co., 803 P.2d 1379 (Wyo. 1991). “Parker Drilling directs our attention to Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-301 (1977), amended by 1989 Wyo.”
Williams Insulation Co. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 2003 MT 72 (Mont. 2003). “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-301 . As noted by the Wyoming Department of Employment in its denial of coverage of Fugare’s claims, Wyoming workers’ compensation law and insurance did not apply to Fugare because his employment with Williams was localized outside of Wyoming.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-301(a) — 1 case
Kunkle v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 109 P.3d 887 (Wyo. 2005). “Kunkle argues that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-301 (LexisNexis 2003), which purports to require that the employment must be principally located in Wyoming for the act to apply to the work-related injury, pertains only to employment outside of Wyoming and therefore, does not apply to…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-301(a)(2000) — 1 case
Stuarte v. Colorado Interstate Gas, Co., 130 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (D. Wyo. 2001). “The maxim of construction ex-pressio unius est exclusio alterius (the mention of one excludes others) carries added weight in this case considering that § 27-14-301 was created after, and supersedes, Wessel .”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-301(b) — 2 cases
Kunkle v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 109 P.3d 887 (Wyo. 2005). “Kunkle argues that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-301 (LexisNexis 2003), which purports to require that the employment must be principally located in Wyoming for the act to apply to the work-related injury, pertains only to employment outside of Wyoming and therefore, does not apply to…”
Stuarte v. Colorado Interstate Gas, Co., 130 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (D. Wyo. 2001). “The maxim of construction ex-pressio unius est exclusio alterius (the mention of one excludes others) carries added weight in this case considering that § 27-14-301 was created after, and supersedes, Wessel .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.