Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 3-3-104 (2026)
Appointment of conservator.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The court may appoint a conservator if the allegations
of the petition as to the status of the proposed ward and the
necessity for the appointment of a conservator are proved by a
preponderance of the evidence.
(b) The order appointing a conservator shall state the
findings of the court, including:
(i) Reasons why the ward is in need of a conservator;
(ii) Appointment of the conservator;
(iii) The duration of the appointment for a specified
term or permanent, subject to W.S. 3-3-1101;
(iv) The limited or plenary duties of the
conservator.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2023 · leading case: In Re Guardianship of Parkhurst, 2010 WY 155 (Wyo. 2010).
In Re Guardianship of Parkhurst, 2010 WY 155 (Wyo. 2010). “] [¶ 18] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 3-3-104 (LexisNexis 2009) provides: § 3-3-104.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Robert A. Sands: Robert A. Sands v. Richard Brown, Guardian & Conservator, 2013 WY 60 (Wyo. 2013). “§ 3-3-104. Appointment of conservator. (a) The court may appoint a conservator if the allegations of the petition as to the status of the proposed ward and the necessity for the appointment of a conservator are proved by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Madonna M. Flory v. Rand E. Flory, 2023 WY 29 (Wyo. 2023). “§ 3-2-104 (b)(iii)-(iv) (LexisNexis 2021) (guardian); § 3-3-104(b)(iii)-(iv) (conservator). The court may limit the “scope of duties or duration of appointment” under § 3-1-101(a)(x)-(xi).”
Boykin v. Parkhurst ex rel. Boykin, 243 P.3d 961 (Wyo. 2010). “] [¶18] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 3-3-104 (Lexis-Nexis 2009) provides: § 3-3-104.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 3-3-104(b)(iii) — 1 case
Madonna M. Flory v. Rand E. Flory, 2023 WY 29 (Wyo. 2023). “§ 3-2-104 (b)(iii)-(iv) (LexisNexis 2021) (guardian); § 3-3-104(b)(iii)-(iv) (conservator). The court may limit the “scope of duties or duration of appointment” under § 3-1-101(a)(x)-(xi).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.