Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-2-102 (2026)

Scope; certain security and other transactions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

excluded from this article.

Unless the context otherwise requires, this article applies to
transactions in goods; it does not apply to any transaction
which although in the form of an unconditional contract to sell
or present sale is intended to operate only as security
transaction nor does this article impair or repeal any statute
regulating sales to consumers, farmers or other specified
classes of buyers.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2017 · leading case: Wyoming Bd. of Land Commissioners v. Antelope Coal Co., 2008 WY 60 (Wyo. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wyoming Bd. of Land Commissioners v. Antelope Coal Co., 2008 WY 60 (Wyo. 2008). · cites it 2× “" Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 34.1-2-102 . After it is severed from the mineral estate, extracted coal is a "good" within the meaning of the Wyoming Uniform Commercial Code.”

In re Escalera Resources Co., 563 B.R. 336 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 4-2-102 (1); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 34.1-2-102 (1). 6 Third, the UCC purports to be a uniform law in the United States' and has been adopted (in one form or another) in 49 States.”

Jackson Hole Traders, Inc. v. Joseph, 931 P.2d 244 (Wyo. 1997). · cites it 3× “…article impair or repeal any statute regulating sales to consumers, farmers or other specified classes of buyers. Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-2-102 (1991).”

Walters v. Grand Teton Crest Outfitters, Inc., 804 F. Supp. 1442 (D. Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “Wyo. Stat. §§ 34.1-2-102, 34.1-2-106 (1991); 1 James White & Robert Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 1-1 (3d ed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.