Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105 (2026)

Control of electronic chattel paper.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A secured party has control of electronic chattel
paper if a system employed for evidencing the transfer of
interest in the chattel paper reliably establishes the secured
party as the person to which the chattel paper was assigned.

     (b) A system satisfies subsection (a) of this section if
the record or records comprising the chattel paper are created,
stored and assigned in such a manner that:

          (i) A single authoritative copy of the record or
records exists which is unique, identifiable and, except as
otherwise provided in paragraphs (iv), (v) and (vi),
unalterable;
          (ii) The authoritative copy identifies the secured
party as the assignee of the record or records;

          (iii) The authoritative copy is communicated to and
maintained by the secured party or its designated custodian;

          (iv) Copies or amendments that add or change an
identified assignee of the authoritative copy can be made only
with the consent of the secured party;

          (v) Each copy of the authoritative copy and any copy
of a copy is readily identifiable as a copy that is not the
authoritative copy; and

          (vi) Any amendment of the authoritative copy is
readily identifiable as authorized or unauthorized.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1997 · leading case: Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V., 816 P.2d 808 (Wyo. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V., 816 P.2d 808 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 4× “[1] Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(iii) (1991) states: (iii) "Collateral" means the property subject to a security interest, and includes accounts and chattel paper which have been sold[.”

Royal v. First Interstate Bank of Com. (In Re Straight), 207 B.R. 217 (10th Cir. BAP 1997). “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 34.1-9-203 (a)(i). A “security agreement” is “an agreement which creates or provides for a security interest.”

Giacchino v. Est. of Stalkup, 908 P.2d 983 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 2× “1-1-101 to -10-104 (1991) (UCC), “ ‘[sjecurity agreement’ means an agreement which creates or provides for a security interest * ⅜ Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(xii). The statute later provides, however, that even though a transaction is subject to the article on secured…”

— Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(iii) — 1 case

Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V., 816 P.2d 808 (Wyo. 1991). “[1] Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(iii) (1991) states: (iii) "Collateral" means the property subject to a security interest, and includes accounts and chattel paper which have been sold[.”

— Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(xii) — 1 case

Giacchino v. Est. of Stalkup, 908 P.2d 983 (Wyo. 1995). “1-1-101 to -10-104 (1991) (UCC), “ ‘[sjecurity agreement’ means an agreement which creates or provides for a security interest * ⅜ Wyo. Stat. § 34.1-9-105(a)(xii). The statute later provides, however, that even though a transaction is subject to the article on secured…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.