Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 35-17-105 (2026)

Information of review organizations to be

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
confidential and privileged.

All reports, findings, proceedings and data of the professional
standard review organizations is confidential and privileged,
and is not subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in
any civil action, and no person who is in attendance at a
meeting of the organization shall be permitted or required to
testify in any civil action as to any evidence or other matters
produced or presented during the proceedings of the organization
or as to any findings, recommendations, evaluations, opinions or
other actions of the organization or any members thereof.
However, information, documents or other records otherwise
available from original sources are not to be construed as
immune from discovery or use in any civil action merely because
they were presented during proceedings of the organization, nor
should any person who testifies before the organization or who
is a member of the organization be prevented from testifying as
to matters within his knowledge, but that witness cannot be
asked about his testimony before the organization or opinions
formed by him as a result of proceedings of the organization.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2019 · leading case: Nalder v. West Park Hosp., 254 F.3d 1168 (10th Cir. 2001).
Nalder v. West Park Hosp., 254 F.3d 1168 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “” Wyo. Stat. § 35-17-105; see also id. § 35-17-101 (defining terms).”
Harston v. Campbell Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 913 P.2d 870 (Wyo. 1996). · cites it 6× “CCMH contended this information was confidential and privileged pursuant to the provisions of Wyo.Stat. § 35-17-105 (1994): All reports, findings, proceedings and data of the professional standard review organizations is confidential and privileged, and is not subject to…”
Homeland Ins. Co. of New York v. Powell Hosp. Dist. No 1 (D. Wyo. 2019). · cites it 5× “§ 35-2-606, 609 and W.S. § 35-17-105; § 35-2-910, 35-2-103; W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.