Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 07 - Criminal Procedure / Chapter 13 - SENTENCE AND IMPRISONMENT / Article 4 - PROBATION AND PAROLE GENERALLY
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-409 (2026)

Disclosure of information and data.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
All information and data obtained in the discharge of official
duties by probation and parole agents is privileged information
and shall not be disclosed directly or indirectly to anyone
other than to the judge, the department or to others entitled to
receive reports unless and until otherwise ordered by the judge,
board or department.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Weisser v. State, 600 P.2d 1320 (Wyo. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weisser v. State, 600 P.2d 1320 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 22× “We are next asked: Was appellant's arrest, detention and subsequent probation-revocation hearing invalid for failure of the probation department to follow statutory requirements before applying to the district court for revocation? The appellant argues that § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977…”
Bruce B. Williams v. Terrill R. Tharp, as Circuit Court Judge, 2017 WY 8 (Wyo. 2017). · cites it 6× “The circuit court denied his request, citing Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-409 : All information and data obtained in the discharge of official duties by probation and parole agents is privileged information and shall not be disclosed directly or indirectly to anyone other than to the…”
Cooney v. Park Cnty., 792 P.2d 1287 (Wyo. 1990). · cites it 8× “e hearing; (iii) Shall have the right to confront and examine any person who has made allegations against him, unless the hearing officer determines that the confrontation would present a substantial present or subsequent danger of harm to the person or persons; (iv) May admit,…”
Joseph Lyle Fredrick v. The State of Wyoming, 2024 WY 121 (Wyo. 2024). · cites it 20× “Fredrick demanded were privileged under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-409 (2023) and the discovery dispute did not warrant dismissal? FACTS [¶3] In June 2021, the State charged Mr.”
Schmidt v. State, 738 P.2d 1105 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 8× “I would also conclude that the district court's denial of counsel's motion to withdraw violated appellant's rights under § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977, and the constitutional requirements of Strickland v.”
Janpol v. State, 2008 WY 21 (Wyo. 2008). · cites it 2× “As to the confidentiality of the information collected in the process, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-409 (LexisNexis 2007) provides as follows: All information and data obtained in the discharge of official duties by probation and parole agents is privileged information and shall not…”
Alexander v. State, 823 P.2d 1198 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 6× “His argument, however, is hinged upon his claim that, pursuant to Section 7-13-409, W.S.1977 (June 1987 Repl.”
Mason v. State, 631 P.2d 1051 (Wyo. 1981). · cites it 2× “The method provided for by law under § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977, allows for the county attorney (as in Knobel v.”
Cooney v. White, 845 P.2d 353 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 4× “The prosecutor's involvement in advising the probation officer how best to proceed with the information at hand involved voluntary, non-judicially and non-statutorily imposed conduct.”
Knobel v. State, 576 P.2d 941 (Wyo. 1978). · cites it 2× “The warrant was issued and served upon appellant on April 5, and on April 13 his bond was reduced and he was released.”
Pisano v. Shillinger, 814 P.2d 274 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 4× “7-13-401(a)(x) states: "Probation" means a sentence not involving confinement which imposes conditions and retains authority in the sentencing court to modify the conditions of the sentence or to resentence the offender if he violates the conditions[.”
Wlodarczyk v. State, 836 P.2d 279 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “The method provided for by law under § 7-13-409, W.S.1977, [now Wyo.Stat. § 7-13-408] allows for * * * the administrative [state probation and parole] officer * * * to file a petition with the district court, requesting probation revocation.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-409(a) — 1 case
Weisser v. State, 600 P.2d 1320 (Wyo. 1979). “We are next asked: Was appellant's arrest, detention and subsequent probation-revocation hearing invalid for failure of the probation department to follow statutory requirements before applying to the district court for revocation? The appellant argues that § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-409(b) — 1 case
Weisser v. State, 600 P.2d 1320 (Wyo. 1979). “We are next asked: Was appellant's arrest, detention and subsequent probation-revocation hearing invalid for failure of the probation department to follow statutory requirements before applying to the district court for revocation? The appellant argues that § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-409(c)(iii) — 1 case
Schmidt v. State, 738 P.2d 1105 (Wyo. 1987). “I would also conclude that the district court's denial of counsel's motion to withdraw violated appellant's rights under § 7-13-409, W.S. 1977, and the constitutional requirements of Strickland v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.