Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 7-9-105 (2026)

Submission of plan to court; approval or

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

modification.

The defendant's plan of restitution and the comments of the
probation and parole officer or any other person directed by the
court to assist in the preparation of the restitution plan shall
be submitted promptly to the court. The court shall promptly
enter an order approving the plan or modifying it and providing
for restitution payments to the extent that the defendant is or
may become reasonably able to make restitution, taking into
account the factors enumerated in W.S. 7-9-106. The court may
modify the plan at any time upon the defendant's request, upon
the court's own motion and, for those cases within the
provisions of W.S. 7-9-113 through 7-9-115, upon the motion of
the victim.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1979–2018 · leading case: Anderson v. State, 408 P.3d 1148 (Wyo. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anderson v. State, 408 P.3d 1148 (Wyo. 2018). · cites it 4× “In accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-9-105 , ultimate approval of a restitution plan remains with the court and the court has discretion to modify a submitted plan to reflect conditions the court finds warranted.”

Abeyta v. State, 2002 WY 44 (Wyo. 2002). · cites it 2× “[T8] After a hearing, the district court denied the petition, but did order that pursuant to its discretionary authority under Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 7-9-105 and 106, the order of restitution should be reduced by the sum of $50,000.”

Chavez v. State, 604 P.2d 1341 (Wyo. 1979). “and § 7-9-105, W.S.1977. Rule 6(a), W.R.Cr.P.”

Hart v. State, 37 P.3d 1286 (Wyo. 2002). · cites it 2× “These factors are set out in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-9-106 (a) (LexisNexis 2001) and include the defendant's physical and mental health and condition, age, education, employment cireumstances, potential for employment and vocational training, financial condition and whether the…”

Bobbie J. Shafer, 2015 WY 38 (Wyo. 2015). “Shafer is unable to satisfy her obligation within ten years, she may ask the district court to modify the plan pursuant to § 7-9-105. Under these cireumstances, we conclude the district court's failure to find that Ms.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.